Falken Linam VAN01 review
The Falken Linam VAN01 receives highly polarized feedback from users, with experiences ranging from reliable wet-weather performance to significant traction issues. While some drivers praise its durability and quiet operation compared to previous sets, others report premature tread wear and a concerning lack of grip in damp conditions.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
52%By road tests
56.3%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 4 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The Falken Linam VAN01 receives highly polarized feedback from users, with experiences ranging from reliable wet-weather performance to significant traction issues. While some drivers praise its durability and quiet operation compared to previous sets, others report premature tread wear and a concerning lack of grip in damp conditions.
Pros
- Strong wet-weather traction for some users
- Improved durability and tread life compared to budget alternatives
- Low noise levels during operation
- Stiff sidewall construction providing stability
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip leading to wheel spin
- Reports of premature tread wear in high-torque applications
- Lack of confidence in emergency braking performance
- Significant performance variance between different driving styles and road conditions
Worth knowing
- Users driving front-wheel-drive vans report higher instances of wheel spin and traction loss during acceleration.
- Performance appears highly sensitive to the specific vehicle's torque delivery, with some users suggesting the tire is better suited for non-driven axles.
1 published test appearance
Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.
2019 ADAC Van 215/65 R16 C tire Test · 215/65 R16
8th of 16
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|