49
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Falken Linam VAN01 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Linam VAN01 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 91 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 44
Why this score
| Source | Linam VAN01 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 43 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Linam VAN01 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 45
Why this score
| Source | Linam VAN01 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 37 | 81 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Linam VAN01 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 80 |
| DriverReviews owners | 78 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Linam VAN01 | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 49 | 85 |
| Dry | 63 | 91 |
| Wet | 43 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 60 | 88 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 82 |
| Handling | 53 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
49
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Linam VAN01 receives highly polarized feedback from users, with experiences ranging from reliable wet-weather performance to significant traction issues. While some drivers praise its durability and quiet operation compared to previous sets, others report premature tread wear and a concerning lack of grip in damp conditions.
Pros
- Strong wet-weather traction for some users
- Improved durability and tread life compared to budget alternatives
- Low noise levels during operation
- Stiff sidewall construction providing stability
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip leading to wheel spin
- Reports of premature tread wear in high-torque applications
- Lack of confidence in emergency braking performance
- Significant performance variance between different driving styles and road conditions
Observations
- Users driving front-wheel-drive vans report higher instances of wheel spin and traction loss during acceleration.
- Performance appears highly sensitive to the specific vehicle's torque delivery, with some users suggesting the tire is better suited for non-driven axles.
The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
- Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
- Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
- Not suitable for high-performance track applications
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
- Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
- Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Linam VAN01 | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Van | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
49
/ 100
Falken
85
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 43 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 63 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 60 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken Linam VAN01
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken Linam VAN01 also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.