Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Firestone Winterforce 2 UV — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
Owner ratings
Dry
87
Wet
89
Snow
91
Comfort
84
Noise
80
Treadwear
86
Handling
86

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better noise, comfort and wet. Pick the Firestone Winterforce 2 UV if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winterforce 2 UV leads by 5
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
B — Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
87
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Winterforce 2 UV
Professional tests (TWG score) 71
Tire Rack owners 93 89
Tyre Reviews owners 93
SimpleTire owners 99 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 3
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
B — Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
89
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Winterforce 2 UV
Tire Rack owners 92 89
Tyre Reviews owners 93
SimpleTire owners 93 91

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 3
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
91
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Winterforce 2 UV
Professional tests (TWG score) 100
Tire Rack owners 83 89
Tyre Reviews owners 90
SimpleTire owners 86 94

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 10
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
84
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Winterforce 2 UV
Tire Rack owners 90 83
Tyre Reviews owners 97
SimpleTire owners 95 88

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 13
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
B — Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
80
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Winterforce 2 UV
SimpleTire owners 94 80

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 3
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
B — Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
86
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Winterforce 2 UV
Tire Rack owners 91 85
Tyre Reviews owners 93
SimpleTire owners 89 83

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winterforce 2 UV leads by 1
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
B — Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
86
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Winterforce 2 UV
Tyre Reviews owners 85

Scores at a glance

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Firestone Winterforce 2 UV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
Relative Score 90 86
Dry 82 87
Wet 92 89
Snow 94 91
Comfort 94 84
Noise 93 80
Treadwear 89 86
Handling 85 86

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B Firestone Winterforce 2 UV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
Sizes available4030
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 18″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″12/32″
UTQG740 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Firestone

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better noise, comfort and wet. Pick the Firestone Winterforce 2 UV if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 93 vs 80 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 84 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Winterforce 2 UV scores 87 vs 82 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 89 on wet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Firestone Winterforce 2 UV

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.