Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 4 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV vs Michelin Energy X2+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy X2+ leads, 75–73 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Energy X2+ +175Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Energy X2+ Reviews found online 77 78 -
77
Wet
Energy X2+ +279Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Energy X2+ Reviews found online 79 82 -
70
Comfort
Energy X2+ +272Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Energy X2+ Reviews found online 72 76 -
67
Treadwear
Energy X2+ +572Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Energy X2+ Reviews found online 68 77 -
75
Handling
Energy X2+ +277Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Energy X2+ Reviews found online 75 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV | Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 75 |
| Dry | 74 | 75 |
| Wet | 77 | 79 |
| Comfort | 70 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 72 |
| Handling | 75 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Eco Contact 5 SUV
75
/ 100
Energy X2+
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eco Contact 5 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and mileage
- High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Faster wear on the heavier front axle of certain diesel models
- Moderate lifespan reported by drivers with more aggressive driving habits on country roads
Tire B Energy X2+
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV | B · Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV
75
/ 100
Michelin Energy X2+
Winner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 72 vs 67 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV
Tire B · Michelin Energy X2+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.