Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 4 reviews
Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Eco Contact 5 SUV is ahead, 73–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Eco Contact 5 SUV +1955Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 77 48 -
77
Wet
Eco Contact 5 SUV +2057Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 79 53 -
70
Comfort
Eco Contact 5 SUV +1753Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 72 38 -
67
Treadwear
Eco Contact 5 SUV +364Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 68 63 -
75
Handling
Eco Contact 5 SUV +2946Why this score
Source Eco Contact 5 SUV Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 75 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV | Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 56 |
| Dry | 74 | 55 |
| Wet | 77 | 57 |
| Comfort | 70 | 53 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 64 |
| Handling | 75 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eco Contact 5 SUV
Bluearth E51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eco Contact 5 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and mileage
- High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Faster wear on the heavier front axle of certain diesel models
- Moderate lifespan reported by drivers with more aggressive driving habits on country roads
Tire B Bluearth E51
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV | B · Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV
Yokohama Bluearth E51
Winner: Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV scores 75 vs 46 on handling.
Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV scores 77 vs 57 on wet.
Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV scores 74 vs 55 on dry.
Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV scores 70 vs 53 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.