Head-to-head Updated

Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Eco Contact 5 SUV is ahead, 73–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BYokohama

Bluearth E51

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Eco Contact 5 SUV +19
    55
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact 5 SUVBluearth E51
    Reviews found online7748
  2. 77

    Wet

    Eco Contact 5 SUV +20
    57
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact 5 SUVBluearth E51
    Reviews found online7953
  3. 70

    Comfort

    Eco Contact 5 SUV +17
    53
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact 5 SUVBluearth E51
    Reviews found online7238
  4. 67

    Treadwear

    Eco Contact 5 SUV +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact 5 SUVBluearth E51
    Reviews found online6863
  5. 75

    Handling

    Eco Contact 5 SUV +29
    46
    Why this score
    SourceEco Contact 5 SUVBluearth E51
    Reviews found online7546
Scores at a glance
Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV vs Yokohama Bluearth E51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Eco Contact 5 SUVYokohama Bluearth E51
Relative Score 73 56
Dry 74 55
Wet 77 57
Comfort 70 53
Treadwear 67 64
Handling 75 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Eco Contact 5 SUV

Bluearth E51

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eco Contact 5 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and mileage
  • High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Faster wear on the heavier front axle of certain diesel models
  • Moderate lifespan reported by drivers with more aggressive driving habits on country roads
All owner themes in the Eco Contact 5 SUV review

Tire B Bluearth E51

Pros

  • Impressive tread longevity and durability
  • Stable handling in dry conditions
  • Adequate performance for standard commuting

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
  • Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
  • Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
All owner themes in the Bluearth E51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV B · Yokohama Bluearth E51
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV

Yokohama Bluearth E51

Winner: Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV scores 75 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV scores 77 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV scores 74 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV scores 70 vs 53 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental Eco Contact 5 SUV
Tire B · Yokohama Bluearth E51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

73

Leads

Eco Contact 5 SUV

Amazon