65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
80/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
58/100
153 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
51
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
50/100
22 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental EcoContact 6 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
EcoContact 6 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 68 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
EcoContact 6 leads by 32
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 35 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
EcoContact 6 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 57 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Maystorm 2 B 2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 51 | 52 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
EcoContact 6 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 54 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental EcoContact 6 | Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 51 |
| Dry | 84 | 68 |
| Wet | 67 | 35 |
| Comfort | 69 | 57 |
| Noise | 73 | – |
| Treadwear | 51 | 52 |
| Handling | 60 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
51
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental EcoContact 6 is a polarizing tire that prioritizes fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance at the expense of longevity and wet-weather performance. While many users appreciate its quiet ride and contribution to fuel economy, a significant number of owners report rapid tread wear, poor wet-surface traction, and a lack of confidence-inspiring handling, particularly when fitted as original equipment on modern vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Stable and predictable performance on dry, well-maintained roads
- Good initial road feedback for daily commuting
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Poor wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
- Low initial tread depth (often reported at 6.0-6.5mm) compared to industry standards
- Weak sidewall construction prone to punctures and bulging
- Inconsistent performance as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles, particularly EVs and PHEVs, report significantly accelerated tread wear and concerns regarding sidewall durability.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or higher-torque vehicles frequently note that the tire's soft compound struggles to manage power, leading to excessive wheel spin and understeer.
- Owners of compact SUVs and crossovers frequently cite issues with stone punctures, suggesting the tread pattern or carcass design is ill-suited for anything beyond pristine asphalt.
The Riken Maystorm 2 B2 is widely regarded by users as a budget-tier tire that offers acceptable performance in dry conditions but presents significant safety concerns in wet weather. The consensus among reviewers is that the tire suffers from rapid tread wear, poor wet-surface traction, and unpredictable handling, leading many to label it a false economy despite its low initial purchase price.
Pros
- Low initial purchase price
- Adequate grip and handling on dry pavement
- Generally quiet operation
Cons
- Dangerous lack of traction in wet or damp conditions
- Extremely rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Poor braking performance
- Unpredictable handling and lack of driver confidence
Observations
- Users driving heavier vehicles, such as the Citroen DS5, reported accelerated tread wear and poor performance compared to expectations.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles like the Toyota Aygo and Yaris noted a 'floaty' or unstable feeling at highway speeds.
- Owners of electric vehicles, such as the Renault Zoe, reported that the tire's lack of grip was particularly hazardous given the vehicle's torque characteristics.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental EcoContact 6 | B · Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 7/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental
51
/ 100
Riken
Winner: Continental EcoContact 6 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 67 vs 35 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 84 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 69 vs 57 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental EcoContact 6 scores 60 vs 54 on handling.
Tire A · Continental EcoContact 6
Tire B · Riken Maystorm 2 B 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental EcoContact 6 also compared with
Riken Maystorm 2 B 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.