65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
80/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
58/100
153 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
NanoEnergy R38 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 88 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
NanoEnergy R38 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 81 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
NanoEnergy R38 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
NanoEnergy R38 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 51 | 76 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
NanoEnergy R38 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | EcoContact 6 | NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental EcoContact 6 | Toyo NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 81 |
| Dry | 84 | 88 |
| Wet | 67 | 81 |
| Comfort | 69 | 80 |
| Noise | 73 | – |
| Treadwear | 51 | 76 |
| Handling | 60 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental EcoContact 6 is a polarizing tire that prioritizes fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance at the expense of longevity and wet-weather performance. While many users appreciate its quiet ride and contribution to fuel economy, a significant number of owners report rapid tread wear, poor wet-surface traction, and a lack of confidence-inspiring handling, particularly when fitted as original equipment on modern vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Stable and predictable performance on dry, well-maintained roads
- Good initial road feedback for daily commuting
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Poor wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
- Low initial tread depth (often reported at 6.0-6.5mm) compared to industry standards
- Weak sidewall construction prone to punctures and bulging
- Inconsistent performance as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles, particularly EVs and PHEVs, report significantly accelerated tread wear and concerns regarding sidewall durability.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or higher-torque vehicles frequently note that the tire's soft compound struggles to manage power, leading to excessive wheel spin and understeer.
- Owners of compact SUVs and crossovers frequently cite issues with stone punctures, suggesting the tread pattern or carcass design is ill-suited for anything beyond pristine asphalt.
The Toyo NanoEnergy R38 is widely regarded as a high-performing mid-range tire that frequently exceeds expectations, often drawing favorable comparisons to premium brands. Users consistently praise its reliable grip and predictable handling characteristics in both wet and dry conditions, making it a strong value proposition for daily driving.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- Predictable handling with clear feedback at the limit
- High value-for-money compared to premium competitors
- Commendable tread longevity
Cons
- Reported instances of moderate road noise
- Availability can be limited as it is often an OEM-specific fitment
Observations
- Frequently cited as a reliable factory-fitted choice for the Mazda 3 platform.
- Users report consistent performance across various driving styles, with tread life reaching up to 32,000 miles on front-wheel-drive configurations.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental EcoContact 6 | B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 7/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental
81
/ 100
Toyo
Winner: Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 76 vs 51 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 81 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 81 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 80 vs 69 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental EcoContact 6
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental EcoContact 6 also compared with
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.