Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Michelin

Michelin CrossClimate+

All Season Premium Touring tires

Michelin CrossClimate+ tread pattern
Objective (60%)
88/100
16 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
117 owner reviews
Dry
88
Wet
85
Snow
75
Comfort
81
Noise
76
Treadwear
86
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Toyo

Toyo NanoEnergy R38

Summer Premium Touring tires

Toyo NanoEnergy R38 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
8 owner reviews
Dry
88
Wet
81
Snow
–
Comfort
80
Noise
–
Treadwear
76
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Toyo NanoEnergy R38 if handling matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin CrossClimate+
88
B — Toyo NanoEnergy R38
88
Why this score
SourceCrossClimate+NanoEnergy R38
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 87 88

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossClimate+ leads by 4
A — Michelin CrossClimate+
85
B — Toyo NanoEnergy R38
81
Why this score
SourceCrossClimate+NanoEnergy R38
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 –
Tyre Reviews owners 85 81

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin CrossClimate+
75
B — Toyo NanoEnergy R38
–
Why this score
SourceCrossClimate+NanoEnergy R38
Professional tests (TWG score) 70 –
Tyre Reviews owners 82 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossClimate+ leads by 1
A — Michelin CrossClimate+
81
B — Toyo NanoEnergy R38
80
Why this score
SourceCrossClimate+NanoEnergy R38
Professional tests (TWG score) 78 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 80

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin CrossClimate+
76
B — Toyo NanoEnergy R38
–
Why this score
SourceCrossClimate+NanoEnergy R38
Professional tests (TWG score) 76 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossClimate+ leads by 10
A — Michelin CrossClimate+
86
B — Toyo NanoEnergy R38
76
Why this score
SourceCrossClimate+NanoEnergy R38
Tyre Reviews owners 86 76

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) NanoEnergy R38 leads by 8
A — Michelin CrossClimate+
73
B — Toyo NanoEnergy R38
81
Why this score
SourceCrossClimate+NanoEnergy R38
Tyre Reviews owners 73 81

Scores at a glance

Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Toyo NanoEnergy R38: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate+Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Relative Score 83 81
Dry 88 88
Wet 85 81
Snow 75 –
Comfort 81 80
Noise 76 –
Treadwear 86 76
Handling 73 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Michelin CrossClimate+

The Michelin CrossClimate+ is widely regarded as a benchmark all-season tire, praised for its exceptional versatility and ability to bridge the gap between summer handling and winter safety. While most users report high levels of confidence in wet, dry, and snowy conditions, a minority of users note a decline in performance as the tread wears down or express dissatisfaction with noise levels and ride harshness on specific vehicle setups.

Pros

  • Excellent traction and confidence in light to moderate snow and ice.
  • Strong wet and dry road handling that rivals dedicated summer tires.
  • Impressive tread longevity and durability over high mileage.
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for the majority of users.
  • Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures.

Cons

  • Performance in wet conditions can diminish significantly as the tire wears.
  • Increased road noise reported by some users compared to dedicated summer tires.
  • Occasional reports of a harsh or 'bouncy' ride on certain vehicle suspensions.
  • Higher price point compared to competitors.
  • Some users report a 'spongy' or less precise steering feel during aggressive cornering.

Observations

  • Users with heavier diesel vehicles or high-torque setups occasionally report faster tread wear and increased road noise.
  • Drivers of lighter vehicles (e.g., small hatchbacks) often report improved steering responsiveness and comfort compared to OEM tires.
  • Performance on SUVs and 4x4s is frequently cited as a major upgrade over standard summer tires, particularly for winter mountain driving.
Tire B Toyo NanoEnergy R38

The Toyo NanoEnergy R38 is widely regarded as a high-performing mid-range tire that frequently exceeds expectations, often drawing favorable comparisons to premium brands. Users consistently praise its reliable grip and predictable handling characteristics in both wet and dry conditions, making it a strong value proposition for daily driving.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • Predictable handling with clear feedback at the limit
  • High value-for-money compared to premium competitors
  • Commendable tread longevity

Cons

  • Reported instances of moderate road noise
  • Availability can be limited as it is often an OEM-specific fitment

Observations

  • Frequently cited as a reliable factory-fitted choice for the Mazda 3 platform.
  • Users report consistent performance across various driving styles, with tread life reaching up to 32,000 miles on front-wheel-drive configurations.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate+ B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin

Toyo

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Toyo NanoEnergy R38 if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 86 vs 76 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 81 vs 73 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 85 vs 81 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy R38

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.