65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV vs Michelin Energy XM2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
55 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Energy XM2 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Premium Contact 5 SUV leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 SUV | Energy XM2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Energy XM2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 SUV | Energy XM2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 74 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy XM2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 SUV | Energy XM2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 72 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy XM2 leads by 39
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 SUV | Energy XM2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 48 | 86 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Energy XM2 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 SUV | Energy XM2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 74 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV | Michelin Energy XM2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 78 |
| Dry | 82 | 81 |
| Wet | 72 | 74 |
| Comfort | 67 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 47 | 86 |
| Handling | 68 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV receives a mixed reception, with users praising its reliable dry and wet braking performance while expressing significant concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels. While initial impressions often highlight comfort and grip, the tire's performance tends to degrade over time, leading to dissatisfaction among owners regarding value and durability.
Pros
- Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
- Strong handling and confidence in wet weather
- Quiet operation during the initial stages of the tire's life
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and disappointing overall mileage
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Poor traction and handling in snowy or winter conditions
- High rolling resistance impacting fuel efficiency
Observations
- SUV owners, specifically those driving the Hyundai Tucson, reported issues with wheel spin and a lack of handling confidence.
- Multiple users noted that the tires required replacement significantly earlier than expected, with some front-axle sets failing before 20,000 miles.
The Michelin Energy XM2 is widely regarded as a durable, long-lasting touring tire that excels in tread life and reliability for daily commuting. While many users praise its comfort and consistent performance, opinions are polarized regarding noise levels and wet-weather grip, with some drivers finding them exceptionally quiet and others reporting significant road noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong puncture resistance
- Reliable dry and wet grip for daily driving
- High levels of ride comfort
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can feel less responsive during spirited driving
- Premium price point compared to competitors
- Inconsistent performance feedback regarding wet-weather traction
Observations
- Users with smaller hatchbacks and sedans frequently report high satisfaction with comfort and fuel efficiency.
- Drivers of heavier or higher-torque vehicles occasionally noted that the soft sidewalls lead to noticeable body roll and less precise handling.
- Owners of vehicles with smaller wheel diameters (15-16 inch) often view the tire as a significant upgrade over budget stock options.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV | B · Michelin Energy XM2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental
78
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Energy XM2 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 86 vs 47 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 74 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV
Tire B · Michelin Energy XM2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental Premium Contact 5 SUV also compared with
Michelin Energy XM2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.