66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ProContact vs Yokohama AVS Sport — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVS Sport — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVS Sport leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVS Sport leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 35 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AVS Sport leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 82 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AVS Sport leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 82 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
AVS Sport leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact | Yokohama AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 84 |
| Dry | 73 | 93 |
| Wet | 69 | 80 |
| Snow | 35 | – |
| Comfort | 59 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 82 |
| Handling | 66 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ProContact series receives a polarized reception, often serving as a polarizing OEM fitment that balances adequate dry-weather performance with significant concerns regarding long-term noise levels and durability. While some drivers appreciate their predictable handling and comfort, a notable portion of users report premature tread wear, excessive road noise, and structural issues such as sidewall bubbles.
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
- Good initial traction for standard commuting
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
- Below-average performance in winter and snow conditions
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles, such as the Tesla Model Y, report acceptable tread wear given the vehicle's high torque, though winter performance remains a weak point.
- Drivers of compact sedans frequently cite excessive cabin noise and a 'soggy' steering feel, suggesting the tire may not be well-suited for smaller, less-insulated chassis.
- Run-flat variants (SSR) on performance-oriented sedans like the Alfa Romeo Giulia show a tendency for rapid tread depletion.
The Yokohama AVS Sport is highly regarded by enthusiasts for its exceptional dry and wet grip, often cited as a benchmark performance tire of its era. While users frequently lament its discontinuation, the consensus highlights a strong balance of handling precision and surprising longevity, despite some reports of increased road noise.
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet weather traction
- High level of handling precision and cornering confidence
- Impressive tread life relative to its performance category
- Strong value proposition for the level of performance provided
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, particularly during the first half of the tread life
- Limited availability due to the tire being out of production
- Performance degradation noted when tread depth reaches the final 2mm
Observations
- Drivers of heavy, high-horsepower vehicles reported that the tire maintains structural integrity and grip well under load.
- Lightweight, balanced vehicles (approx. 1250kg) experienced significantly higher-than-expected mileage, exceeding 19,000 miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact | B · Yokohama AVS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Continental
84
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVS Sport — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama AVS Sport scores 90 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama AVS Sport scores 82 vs 59 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AVS Sport scores 93 vs 73 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama AVS Sport scores 82 vs 64 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ProContact
Tire B · Yokohama AVS Sport
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ProContact also compared with
Yokohama AVS Sport also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.