62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental ProContact vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better snow, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 45
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 35 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 56 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 78 |
| Dry | 73 | 77 |
| Wet | 69 | 81 |
| Snow | 35 | 80 |
| Comfort | 59 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 77 |
| Handling | 66 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ProContact series receives a polarized reception, often serving as a polarizing OEM fitment that balances adequate dry-weather performance with significant concerns regarding long-term noise levels and durability. While some drivers appreciate their predictable handling and comfort, a notable portion of users report premature tread wear, excessive road noise, and structural issues such as sidewall bubbles.
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
- Good initial traction for standard commuting
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
- Below-average performance in winter and snow conditions
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles, such as the Tesla Model Y, report acceptable tread wear given the vehicle's high torque, though winter performance remains a weak point.
- Drivers of compact sedans frequently cite excessive cabin noise and a 'soggy' steering feel, suggesting the tire may not be well-suited for smaller, less-insulated chassis.
- Run-flat variants (SSR) on performance-oriented sedans like the Alfa Romeo Giulia show a tendency for rapid tread depletion.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
- Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
- Predictable handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
- Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
- Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
- Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Continental
78
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better snow, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 80 vs 35 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 83 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 77 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 81 vs 69 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ProContact
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ProContact also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.