Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental ProContact vs Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 82 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 88 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 35 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 62 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 78 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | ProContact | Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact | Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 94 |
| Dry | 73 | 96 |
| Wet | 69 | 94 |
| Snow | 35 | – |
| Comfort | 59 | 94 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 91 |
| Handling | 66 | 96 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ProContact series receives a polarized reception, often serving as a polarizing OEM fitment that balances adequate dry-weather performance with significant concerns regarding long-term noise levels and durability. While some drivers appreciate their predictable handling and comfort, a notable portion of users report premature tread wear, excessive road noise, and structural issues such as sidewall bubbles.
Pros
- Predictable and safe handling on dry pavement
- Competent performance in high-heat conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality for calm, daily driving
- Good initial traction for standard commuting
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Premature tread wear and limited mileage lifespan
- Structural reliability issues, including sidewall bubbles and flat-spotting
- Below-average performance in winter and snow conditions
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles, such as the Tesla Model Y, report acceptable tread wear given the vehicle's high torque, though winter performance remains a weak point.
- Drivers of compact sedans frequently cite excessive cabin noise and a 'soggy' steering feel, suggesting the tire may not be well-suited for smaller, less-insulated chassis.
- Run-flat variants (SSR) on performance-oriented sedans like the Alfa Romeo Giulia show a tendency for rapid tread depletion.
The Michelin Pilot Sport AS 3+ is widely regarded as a high-performance all-season tire that excels in wet and dry handling, often serving as a superior replacement for harsh OEM run-flat tires. While users consistently praise its confidence-inspiring grip and versatility across varying temperatures, opinions are polarized regarding its tread longevity and noise levels as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Significant improvement in ride comfort compared to OEM run-flat tires
- Predictable and stable handling characteristics in dry conditions
- Strong performance versatility across a wide range of ambient temperatures
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Increased road noise reported by some users, particularly as the tire wears
- Higher rolling resistance compared to standard tires, impacting fuel/range efficiency
- Stiff sidewall construction can lead to a harsher ride on poor road surfaces
Observations
- Tesla owners frequently report a noticeable decrease in range (10-20%) due to the tire's rolling resistance.
- Drivers of performance vehicles (e.g., Corvette, BMW M-series) appreciate the balance of grip and daily usability, though some note a loss of sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ProContact
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+
The community generally views the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ as a high-performing all-season tire that delivers exceptional dry and wet grip, great cornering stability, and low noise compared to stock options. Most users praise them as an ideal compromise for daily drivers who want warm-weather performance without swapping to dedicated summer tires, though some users note they struggle in heavy winter snow compared to competitors like Continental.
“new tires = BIG difference in traction (pilot sport a/s 3+)”
“Pilot Sport A/S 3+ Tires just installed Just got the tires on this morning with an alignment and proper balancing. Holy cow, night and day difference from the original Bridgestones on the car. Car handles so much better. It honestly makes me feel like I just bought a new car. If you have any questions or are considering getting them, feel free to ask!”
“I have had the Michelin Pilot sport A/S3+ for my last two sets of tires, and I had the hydro-edge before that on my old Toyota. So much grip around corners and good rain performance.”
“Are you talking about the all seasons or the summer tires? The summer tires are a terrible choice and you will likely go off the road at some point. Summer tires get hard as a rock in cold temps since they are not meant to be used in winter. If you're talking about the all seasons, I had Pilot Sport A/S 3+ on my 2016 S6 and they were just terrible in snow. So bad that I replaced them after only ~10k miles and put on some Conti Extreme Contact DWS, which were far superior in bad weather. If you want a true all season that can be useful in winter, I'd go with the Contis. But if you are going to be driving in bad weather regularly, get dedicated snows. All seasons are passable here and there but not confidence inspiring.”
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact | B · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Ultra High Performance All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 94 vs 59 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 96 vs 66 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 91 vs 64 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+ scores 94 vs 69 on wet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.