75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental PureContact LS vs Kumho 758 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Continental PureContact LS and Kumho 758 are within 2 points overall. Continental PureContact LS is stronger on dry, handling and wet. Kumho 758 is stronger on treadwear and comfort.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
PureContact LS leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 63 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
PureContact LS leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 70 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 48 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
758 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 65 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
758 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
PureContact LS leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | PureContact LS | 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental PureContact LS | Kumho 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 75 |
| Dry | 86 | 63 |
| Wet | 79 | 70 |
| Snow | 48 | – |
| Comfort | 58 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 95 |
| Handling | 85 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental PureContact LS receives a polarized reception from users, balancing praise for its longevity and wet-weather performance against significant complaints regarding noise levels and cold-weather flat-spotting. While some drivers appreciate the tire's luxury-oriented ride and tread life, others report inconsistent quality and frustrating vibration issues that detract from the overall ownership experience.
Pros
- Extended tread life compared to performance-oriented alternatives
- Reliable grip and stability in wet road conditions
- Comfortable, vibration-isolating ride quality
- Improved handling characteristics over many original equipment tires
Cons
- Persistent flat-spotting issues, particularly in colder temperatures
- Excessive road noise and humming at highway speeds
- Diminished traction and grip performance as the tread wears down
- Inconsistent winter weather capability
Observations
- Owners of luxury sedans like the Lexus ES 350 and Lincoln Continental reported significant issues with morning flat-spotting and vibrations.
- Users transitioning from performance-focused tires, such as the ExtremeContact DWS 06, noted a distinct trade-off between increased tread life and a loss of sporty steering feedback.
The Kumho 758 is generally regarded as a reliable, long-lasting tire that provides competent handling and braking performance in both wet and dry conditions. While it earns praise for its durability and water drainage capabilities, some users report significant compromises in ride comfort and cabin noise levels.
Pros
- Strong handling and braking performance on both wet and dry surfaces
- Excellent water drainage
- Exceptional tread longevity
- Reliable overall road manners
Cons
- Noticeable road noise
- Subpar ride comfort
- Inconsistent user experience regarding refinement
Observations
- Users consistently highlight the tire's durability, suggesting it is well-suited for high-mileage drivers who prioritize longevity over ride quality.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental PureContact LS | B · Kumho 758 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
75
/ 100
Kumho
Too close to call: Continental PureContact LS and Kumho 758 are within 2 points overall. Continental PureContact LS is stronger on dry, handling and wet. Kumho 758 is stronger on treadwear and comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho 758 scores 95 vs 70 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PureContact LS scores 86 vs 63 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental PureContact LS scores 85 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental PureContact LS scores 79 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Tire B · Kumho 758
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental PureContact LS also compared with
Kumho 758 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.