71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
72/100
225 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental Sport Contact 5 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
94/100
28 professional tests
User signal (40%)
93/100
2,091 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better comfort, treadwear and handling. Pick the Continental Sport Contact 5 if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Sport Contact 5 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact 5 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 95 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 92 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 100% | 100% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Sport Contact 5 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact 5 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 94 | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 87 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 99% | 100% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 93% | 100% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 S leads by 41
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact 5 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 26 | 82 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 84 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact 5 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 S leads by 39
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact 5 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 51 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 S leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Sport Contact 5 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 86 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | 92 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Sport Contact 5 | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 90 |
| Dry | 94 | 91 |
| Wet | 89 | 87 |
| Comfort | 45 | 86 |
| Noise | – | 84 |
| Treadwear | 51 | 90 |
| Handling | 76 | 95 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 96% #3/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 98% #2/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test | -1.5 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test | -50 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #3/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 96% #5/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | +2.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 67% #4/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 87% #2/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | -20.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 100% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 90% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | +10 | Different tests |
| Subj. Noise | Subj | 67% #5/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 98% #2/7 · 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test | -31.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 100% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 92% #3/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test | +8.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 99% #3/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test | -0.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 93% #3/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2020 EVO UHP Summer Tyre Test | -7.5 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental Sport Contact 5 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in wet and dry grip, offering exceptional confidence and handling for spirited drivers. However, the consensus is heavily polarized by its rapid tread wear, with a significant number of users reporting premature replacement intervals that diminish the tire's overall value proposition.
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of steering precision and driver feedback
- Strong braking performance
- Good comfort and relatively low road noise for a performance tire
Cons
- Rapid and often premature tread wear
- High price point relative to longevity
- Performance degradation as tread depth decreases
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or curbs
Observations
- Users with high-torque or heavy vehicles (e.g., Audi Q5, Mercedes C-Class, BMW 3-series) frequently report the fastest tread wear, often requiring replacement under 10,000 miles.
- Drivers of lighter, smaller vehicles (e.g., Fiesta, lightweight sports cars) report significantly better longevity, suggesting the compound is highly sensitive to vehicle weight and load.
- The 'ContiSeal' (self-sealing) variants are noted for better durability in some instances, though they remain expensive.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely regarded as a benchmark ultra-high-performance summer tire, consistently praised for its exceptional wet and dry grip, confidence-inspiring handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM run-flat alternatives. While most users laud its versatility and safety, some enthusiasts note that its relatively soft sidewalls can result in slightly less steering precision or feedback compared to more track-focused or stiffer-walled competitors.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High levels of ride comfort and reduced road noise
- Predictable handling and stability at high speeds
- Excellent rim protection design
- Strong longevity for a high-performance tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can feel vague or sluggish during aggressive steering inputs
- High price point compared to competitors
- Performance can degrade significantly as the tread wears down
- Reports of sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
- Not suitable for cold weather or snow
Observations
- Users transitioning from OEM run-flat tires on luxury and performance vehicles (e.g., BMW, Mercedes, Tesla) report a transformative improvement in ride quality and noise reduction.
- Drivers of high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive vehicles frequently highlight the tire's ability to put power down effectively, though some note faster wear on rear axles.
- Some users with heavy vehicles or specific performance setups noted that the tire's soft sidewall can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during rapid direction changes.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental Sport Contact 5
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely praised by the community as a premier max performance summer tire, offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise steering feel, and refined road manners for daily driving and spirited street use. While some users note higher pricing and relatively quick wear on heavier vehicles or hot tracks, it remains a benchmark choice that many enthusiasts gladly return to despite alternatives like Continental or Kumho.
r/CarTrackDays
·97 upvotes ·2026-05-04
“Tire condition after 1st track day. PS4s on a GR86 First 2 pics are drivers front, rest pass front. This was at CMP, temps mid 70s, mostly cloudy. Lowered TP to 31psi. Highest I saw on track was 36 psi. The driver side l thought looked good, but passengers side inner looks like they melted. Is this track rubber I picked up or due to mostly turning right on this clockwise circuit?? Also was pleasantly surprised to only have used 1/16 of tread depth after 110 minutes on track. Given what I have read, thought the ps4s would be all used up. Maybe on a hot track surface they would have been eaten up. Read more”
r/TyreReviews
·41 upvotes ·2026-03-17
“Am I the owner of the newer PS4s?😁 Hello everyone, new in the sub and just want to share my love for the Pilot Sport 4s. This is the third set and I love it. To me they are the perfect compromise beetween performance anche tyre wear. Last set last me 43k km, I do lot of highway and some spirited drive when possibile. I also had a set of Sport Contact 7, awesome grip, to me better than the PS4s, almost too much for my stock Golf. They also wear out faster. I saw yesterday the review of Potenza Sport Evo and they promise very week, maybe next time I’ll try!”
r/cars
·4 upvotes ·2018-08-21
“I’ll say this. Going from the Pilot Super Sport to the Pilot Sport 4 S of the same size, I’m disappointed in the soft sidewall of the 4 S. This is an 8.5” wide wheel with 235/40/18 tires. The left-right fast slalom action got a bit mushy like the weight transfer was slowed down when I switched to the 4 S. I think a shorter sidewall 4 S would perform better in this way, or the same tire on a 9” wide wheel too. That said, the dry and wet grip is exceptional. To save money, I’d recommend the Continental ExtremeContact Sport.”
r/ft86
·2 upvotes ·2023-06-01
“Depending on the size they are absolutely overkill for street use on stock motor. I just installed a set of 245 ps4s on 17x9 rpf1s and its almost impossible to trigger the abs and traction co trol. The car is on absolute rails. That being said, if you have the money, there is not really any negatives from that. I intend to use mine on track days. Felt the cup 2s were overkill for 2 to 3 track days a year.”
Top themes
#Dry and Wet Grip#Tread Life and Wear#Price vs Value#Track Performance Limits#Daily Comfort and Noise#Alternatives Comparison
Based on 104 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Sport Contact 5 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Continental
90
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better comfort, treadwear and handling. Pick the Continental Sport Contact 5 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 86 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 90 vs 51 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 95 vs 76 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental Sport Contact 5 scores 94 vs 91 on dry.
Tire A · Continental Sport Contact 5
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental Sport Contact 5 also compared with
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.