Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental WinterContact TS 790 vs Kumho Winter Craft WP51 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Winter Craft WP51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 94 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 77 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Winter Craft WP51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 74 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Winter Craft WP51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 90 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Winter Craft WP51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 84 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Winter Craft WP51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Winter Craft WP51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 79 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Winter Craft WP51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 790 | Kumho Winter Craft WP51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 78 |
| Dry | 82 | 87 |
| Wet | 92 | 74 |
| Snow | – | 77 |
| Comfort | 86 | 84 |
| Noise | – | 100 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 79 |
| Handling | 88 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental WinterContact TS 790 is regarded as a reliable and durable winter tire, particularly well-suited for regions with mild winter conditions. Users consistently praise its longevity and wet-weather performance, though its capability in deep snow is viewed as adequate rather than class-leading.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong grip and stability in wet conditions
- High level of ride comfort
- Consistent performance in mild, slushy, or light snow environments
Cons
- Limited performance in heavy or deep snow conditions
- Not optimized for severe winter climates
Observations
- Demonstrates excellent versatility and reliability on compact city vehicles like the Skoda Citigo
- Maintains high tread depth even after significant mileage (40,000km)
The Kumho Winter Craft WP51 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in deep snow and icy conditions, often outperforming more expensive competitors in severe weather. While users consistently praise its winter traction and affordability, some report compromises in dry-road handling, wet-weather braking, and increased cabin noise.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and slush
- High price-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
- Solid durability and tread life for the price point
- Effective performance on icy surfaces
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise
- Mediocre wet-weather braking and traction
- Lack of steering feedback and stability on dry pavement
- Potential for tread block squirm during steering inputs
Observations
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Yaris, Mazda 3) report high satisfaction with snow climbing capabilities.
- Owners of heavier or higher-performance vehicles (e.g., Audi A4/A6, Mercedes E220D) noted concerns regarding wet-weather traction and handling precision.
- Some users observed a 15-20% increase in fuel consumption, likely due to the tire's aggressive winter tread compound.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 790 | B · Kumho Winter Craft WP51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Kumho
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 790 — better wet, handling and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Winter Craft WP51 if dry matters most to you.
Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 92 vs 74 on wet.
Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 88 vs 71 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 90 vs 79 on treadwear.
Kumho Winter Craft WP51 scores 87 vs 82 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.