Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental WinterContact TS 790 vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental WinterContact TS 790

Winter High Performance tires

Continental WinterContact TS 790 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
5 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
92
Snow
–
Comfort
86
Noise
–
Treadwear
90
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Hankook

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2

Ultra High Performance Winter tire

Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
79/100
28 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
84
Snow
82
Comfort
82
Noise
100
Treadwear
83
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental WinterContact TS 790 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 2
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
82
B — Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
80
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Winter i*cept evo2
Professional tests (TWG score) – 77
Tyre Reviews owners 82 84

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 8
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
92
B — Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
84
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Winter i*cept evo2
Professional tests (TWG score) – 88
Tyre Reviews owners 92 78

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
–
B — Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
82
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Winter i*cept evo2
Professional tests (TWG score) – 89
Tyre Reviews owners – 73

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 4
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
86
B — Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
82
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Winter i*cept evo2
Tyre Reviews owners 86 82

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
–
B — Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
100
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Winter i*cept evo2
Professional tests (TWG score) – 100

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 7
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
90
B — Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
83
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Winter i*cept evo2
Tyre Reviews owners 90 83

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 7
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
88
B — Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
81
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Winter i*cept evo2
Tyre Reviews owners 88 81

Scores at a glance

Continental WinterContact TS 790 vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental WinterContact TS 790Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
Relative Score 88 82
Dry 82 80
Wet 92 84
Snow – 82
Comfort 86 82
Noise – 100
Treadwear 90 83
Handling 88 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental WinterContact TS 790

The Continental WinterContact TS 790 is regarded as a reliable and durable winter tire, particularly well-suited for regions with mild winter conditions. Users consistently praise its longevity and wet-weather performance, though its capability in deep snow is viewed as adequate rather than class-leading.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Strong grip and stability in wet conditions
  • High level of ride comfort
  • Consistent performance in mild, slushy, or light snow environments

Cons

  • Limited performance in heavy or deep snow conditions
  • Not optimized for severe winter climates

Observations

  • Demonstrates excellent versatility and reliability on compact city vehicles like the Skoda Citigo
  • Maintains high tread depth even after significant mileage (40,000km)
Tire B Hankook Winter i*cept evo2

The Hankook Winter i cept evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented winter tire that performs reliably in mild to moderate winter conditions. While it excels in noise reduction and ride quality, user consensus is mixed regarding its performance in deep snow and its longevity, with some users noting a significant drop-off in grip as the tread wears down over several seasons.

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable and progressive handling in wet and dry conditions
  • Good traction in light to moderate snow and slush

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in performance and grip as the tire ages/tread wears
  • Struggles in deep snow or extreme winter conditions
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback during spirited driving
  • Increased fuel consumption reported by some users

Observations

  • BMW owners frequently use these as a comfortable alternative to factory run-flat tires, noting improved ride quality.
  • Performance on RWD vehicles in deep snow is reported as inconsistent, with some users experiencing significant traction loss.
  • Users with high-torque vehicles noted that the tire can struggle to put power down effectively on dry pavement.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental WinterContact TS 790 B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
CategoryWinter High Performance tiresUltra High Performance Winter tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Hankook

Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 790 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 92 vs 84 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 90 vs 83 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 88 vs 81 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 86 vs 82 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 790
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.