Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental WinterContact TS 790 vs Cooper Evolution H/T — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Cooper Evolution H/T
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Evolution H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Evolution H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | – |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Evolution H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | – |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Evolution H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 790 | Evolution H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 790 | Cooper Evolution H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 88 |
| Dry | 82 | 94 |
| Wet | 92 | 88 |
| Snow | – | 74 |
| Comfort | 86 | 86 |
| Noise | – | 78 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 84 |
| Handling | 88 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental WinterContact TS 790 is regarded as a reliable and durable winter tire, particularly well-suited for regions with mild winter conditions. Users consistently praise its longevity and wet-weather performance, though its capability in deep snow is viewed as adequate rather than class-leading.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong grip and stability in wet conditions
- High level of ride comfort
- Consistent performance in mild, slushy, or light snow environments
Cons
- Limited performance in heavy or deep snow conditions
- Not optimized for severe winter climates
Observations
- Demonstrates excellent versatility and reliability on compact city vehicles like the Skoda Citigo
- Maintains high tread depth even after significant mileage (40,000km)
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 790 | B · Cooper Evolution H/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Cooper
Too close to call: Continental WinterContact TS 790 and Cooper Evolution H/T are within 2 points overall. Continental WinterContact TS 790 is stronger on treadwear and wet. Cooper Evolution H/T is stronger on dry.
Cooper Evolution H/T scores 94 vs 82 on dry.
Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 90 vs 84 on treadwear.
Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 92 vs 88 on wet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.