Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental WinterContact TS 790 vs Cooper Evolution H/T — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental WinterContact TS 790

Winter High Performance tires

Continental WinterContact TS 790 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
5 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
92
Snow
Comfort
86
Noise
Treadwear
90
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Cooper Evolution H/T tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
56 owner reviews
Dry
94
Wet
88
Snow
74
Comfort
86
Noise
78
Treadwear
84
Handling
89

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Continental WinterContact TS 790 and Cooper Evolution H/T are within 2 points overall. Continental WinterContact TS 790 is stronger on treadwear and wet. Cooper Evolution H/T is stronger on dry.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Evolution H/T leads by 12
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
82
B — Cooper Evolution H/T
94
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Evolution H/T
Tyre Reviews owners 82

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 4
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
92
B — Cooper Evolution H/T
88
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Evolution H/T
Tyre Reviews owners 92

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
B — Cooper Evolution H/T
74

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
86
B — Cooper Evolution H/T
86
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Evolution H/T
Tyre Reviews owners 86

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
B — Cooper Evolution H/T
78

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 790 leads by 6
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
90
B — Cooper Evolution H/T
84
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Evolution H/T
Tyre Reviews owners 90

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Evolution H/T leads by 1
A — Continental WinterContact TS 790
88
B — Cooper Evolution H/T
89
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 790Evolution H/T
Tyre Reviews owners 88

Scores at a glance

Continental WinterContact TS 790 vs Cooper Evolution H/T: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental WinterContact TS 790Cooper Evolution H/T
Relative Score 88 88
Dry 82 94
Wet 92 88
Snow 74
Comfort 86 86
Noise 78
Treadwear 90 84
Handling 88 89

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental WinterContact TS 790

The Continental WinterContact TS 790 is regarded as a reliable and durable winter tire, particularly well-suited for regions with mild winter conditions. Users consistently praise its longevity and wet-weather performance, though its capability in deep snow is viewed as adequate rather than class-leading.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Strong grip and stability in wet conditions
  • High level of ride comfort
  • Consistent performance in mild, slushy, or light snow environments

Cons

  • Limited performance in heavy or deep snow conditions
  • Not optimized for severe winter climates

Observations

  • Demonstrates excellent versatility and reliability on compact city vehicles like the Skoda Citigo
  • Maintains high tread depth even after significant mileage (40,000km)
Tire B Cooper Evolution H/T

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental WinterContact TS 790 B · Cooper Evolution H/T
CategoryWinter High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Cooper

Too close to call: Continental WinterContact TS 790 and Cooper Evolution H/T are within 2 points overall. Continental WinterContact TS 790 is stronger on treadwear and wet. Cooper Evolution H/T is stronger on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Cooper Evolution H/T scores 94 vs 82 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 90 vs 84 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental WinterContact TS 790 scores 92 vs 88 on wet.

Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 790
Tire B · Cooper Evolution H/T

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.