72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 vs Firestone F590 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Dunlop Direzza DZ102 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Firestone F590 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Direzza DZ102 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 69 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Direzza DZ102 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 59 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
F590 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 83 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
F590 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 71 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Direzza DZ102 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Direzza DZ102 | F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 56 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop Direzza DZ102 | Firestone F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 67 |
| Dry | 82 | 69 |
| Wet | 73 | 59 |
| Comfort | 70 | 83 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 71 |
| Handling | 69 | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
67
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Dunlop Direzza DZ102 is widely regarded as a high-value, entry-level Ultra-High Performance summer tire that balances impressive dry grip and comfort with an attractive price point. While many users praise its handling and road manners, consensus is split regarding its longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting rapid tread wear and inconsistent traction in heavy rain.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement grip and cornering stability
- Surprisingly high levels of ride comfort for a performance tire
- Low road noise levels compared to competitors in the segment
Cons
- Rapid or inconsistent tread wear
- Inconsistent wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Difficult to balance for some users
Observations
- Users with high-torque or tuned vehicles (300hp+) report that the tire provides sufficient grip to manage power delivery effectively.
- Drivers on 17-inch and 18-inch setups frequently highlight a significant improvement in comfort compared to previous touring or OEM tires.
- Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to correct inflation pressures, with improper settings leading to immediate degradation in feel.
The Firestone F590 receives a mixed reception, characterized by inconsistent performance in wet conditions and concerns regarding long-term durability. While some users appreciate its initial grip and hydroplaning resistance, others report significant safety issues regarding traction loss during acceleration and premature sidewall degradation.
Pros
- Effective hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
- Adequate dry grip for standard daily driving
- Reliable performance for basic commuting needs
Cons
- Poor traction during low-speed acceleration leading to wheel spin
- Premature tread wear and sidewall perishing
- Inconsistent wet weather performance causing safety concerns
- High rolling resistance despite being marketed as a fuel-saver
Observations
- Owners of smaller, low-horsepower vehicles like the Fiat Punto and Ford Fiesta reported frequent traction loss during standing starts.
- Long-term users noted that while tread depth may remain, sidewall integrity can fail after several years of use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop Direzza DZ102 | B · Firestone F590 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Dunlop
67
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Dunlop Direzza DZ102 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Firestone F590 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 scores 73 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 scores 82 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 scores 69 vs 56 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone F590 scores 83 vs 70 on comfort.
Tire A · Dunlop Direzza DZ102
Tire B · Firestone F590
More comparisons
Also compared with
Dunlop Direzza DZ102 also compared with
Firestone F590 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.