Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 vs Kumho Ecsta KU31 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | SP Sport FM800 | Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 83 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | SP Sport FM800 | Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 75 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | SP Sport FM800 | Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 74 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | SP Sport FM800 | Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 72 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | SP Sport FM800 | Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport FM800 | Kumho Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 75 |
| Dry | 88 | 83 |
| Wet | 86 | 75 |
| Comfort | 84 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 82 | 72 |
| Handling | 83 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Dunlop SP Sport FM800 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-budget tire that punches above its weight class in terms of wet and dry grip, comfort, and noise suppression. While most users praise its performance-to-price ratio, some report inconsistent tread longevity and a decline in performance as the rubber compound hardens over time.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Predictable handling and progressive grip limits
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
- Performance degradation as the tire ages/hardens
- Not suitable for high-horsepower or aggressive track use
- Occasional reports of sidewall stiffness or lack of steering precision
Observations
- Users on smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., VW Up, Ford Focus) report excellent handling and satisfaction.
- Drivers of high-performance or heavy vehicles (e.g., C63s AMG, Jaguar XF) noted that the tire struggles with high torque and may experience premature or uneven wear.
- Some users noted that steering feel can be perceived as vague on certain tire profiles, likely due to sidewall construction.
The Kumho Ecsta KU31 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive dry and wet grip for its price point. While many users report performance comparable to premium brands, consensus notes that the tire can become noisy as it wears and may exhibit inconsistent longevity depending on vehicle weight and driving style.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet weather handling
- Progressive and predictable feedback at the limit
- Quiet and comfortable ride when new
Cons
- Increased road noise and potential 'droning' as tread wears
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feel for some drivers
- Occasional reports of balancing issues or structural defects like sidewall bulges
Observations
- Heavier vehicles, such as large sedans and wagons, may experience accelerated inner-edge wear or 'feathering' if alignment is not perfectly maintained.
- Users with high-performance or remapped vehicles report that the tire handles increased torque well, though it may require more frequent rotation to maintain even wear.
- Some owners of vehicles with stiff or lowered suspension noted that the soft sidewalls provide good comfort but can feel slightly 'lethargic' during aggressive cornering.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport FM800 | B · Kumho Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop
Kumho
Winner: Dunlop SP Sport FM800 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 86 vs 75 on wet.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 84 vs 74 on comfort.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 82 vs 72 on treadwear.
Dunlop SP Sport FM800 scores 83 vs 76 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.