75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
165 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecsta KU31 vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta KU31 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU31 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU31 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU31 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU31 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU31 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 57 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 43 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU31 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 73 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU31 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU31 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 61 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU31 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta KU31 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 64 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta KU31 | Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 67 |
| Dry | 83 | 75 |
| Wet | 75 | 64 |
| Snow | – | 44 |
| Comfort | 74 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 63 |
| Handling | 76 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
67
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta KU31 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive dry and wet grip for its price point. While many users report performance comparable to premium brands, consensus notes that the tire can become noisy as it wears and may exhibit inconsistent longevity depending on vehicle weight and driving style.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet weather handling
- Progressive and predictable feedback at the limit
- Quiet and comfortable ride when new
Cons
- Increased road noise and potential 'droning' as tread wears
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feel for some drivers
- Occasional reports of balancing issues or structural defects like sidewall bulges
Observations
- Heavier vehicles, such as large sedans and wagons, may experience accelerated inner-edge wear or 'feathering' if alignment is not perfectly maintained.
- Users with high-performance or remapped vehicles report that the tire handles increased torque well, though it may require more frequent rotation to maintain even wear.
- Some owners of vehicles with stiff or lowered suspension noted that the soft sidewalls provide good comfort but can feel slightly 'lethargic' during aggressive cornering.
The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong value for money
- Attractive aesthetic design
- Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving
Cons
- Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
- Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
- Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
- Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention
Observations
- Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
- Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta KU31 | B · Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 19 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Kumho
67
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecsta KU31 — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta KU31 scores 76 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta KU31 scores 75 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta KU31 scores 72 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta KU31 scores 83 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta KU31
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta KU31 also compared with
Kumho Solus TA31 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.