Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken Azenis FK510

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Falken Azenis FK510 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
25 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
384 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
85
Comfort
62
Noise
84
Treadwear
75
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Michelin

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Summer Max Performance tires

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
94/100
28 professional tests
User signal (40%)
93/100
2,091 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
87
Comfort
86
Noise
84
Treadwear
90
Handling
95

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S leads by 11
A — Falken Azenis FK510
80
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
91
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Professional tests (TWG score) 74 87
Tire Rack owners 89 95
Tyre Reviews owners 88 92
SimpleTire owners 97
Dry Braking (% of best) 97% 92%
Dry Handling (% of best) 98% 96%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S leads by 2
A — Falken Azenis FK510
85
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 83
Tire Rack owners 86 88
Tyre Reviews owners 88 87
SimpleTire owners 91
Wet Braking (% of best) 87% 95%
Wet Circle (% of best) 93% 87%
Wet Handling (% of best) 96% 97%

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S leads by 24
A — Falken Azenis FK510
62
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
86
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Professional tests (TWG score) 49 82
Tire Rack owners 83 87
Tyre Reviews owners 77 84
SimpleTire owners 95

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Falken Azenis FK510
84
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
84
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Professional tests (TWG score) 73 78
SimpleTire owners 88

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S leads by 15
A — Falken Azenis FK510
75
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
90
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Tire Rack owners 77 80
Tyre Reviews owners 71 80
SimpleTire owners 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport 4 S leads by 14
A — Falken Azenis FK510
81
B — Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510Pilot Sport 4 S
Tyre Reviews owners 81 86
DriverReviews owners 86 92

Scores at a glance

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Relative Score 78 89
Dry 80 91
Wet 85 87
Comfort 62 86
Noise 84 84
Treadwear 75 90
Handling 81 95

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 91% #6/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test +8.8 Different tests
Dry Braking Dry 97% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 92% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test +5 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #10/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 96% #4/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test +2 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 90% #4/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test 93% #2/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test -3.5 Different tests
Noise Other 96% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 97% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test -1.7 Different tests
Price Other 86% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 100% #8/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test -14 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 11% #9/10 · 2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tyre Test 17% #6/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test -5.6 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 95% #2/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 98% #3/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test -3.1 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 78% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test -12.2 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 80% #5/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Sports Tyre Test -20 Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling Subj 78% #3/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test 78% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test -0.2 Different tests
Tyre Weight Tyre 93% #5/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test -5.8 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 87% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 95% #3/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test -7.6 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 93% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 87% #7/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test +5.4 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 96% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 97% #7/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test -1.8 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken Azenis FK510

The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
  • Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
  • Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down

Observations

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
  • Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
Tire B Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely regarded as a benchmark ultra-high-performance summer tire, consistently praised for its exceptional wet and dry grip, confidence-inspiring handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM run-flat alternatives. While most users laud its versatility and safety, some enthusiasts note that its relatively soft sidewalls can result in slightly less steering precision or feedback compared to more track-focused or stiffer-walled competitors.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High levels of ride comfort and reduced road noise
  • Predictable handling and stability at high speeds
  • Excellent rim protection design
  • Strong longevity for a high-performance tire

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can feel vague or sluggish during aggressive steering inputs
  • High price point compared to competitors
  • Performance can degrade significantly as the tread wears down
  • Reports of sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
  • Not suitable for cold weather or snow

Observations

  • Users transitioning from OEM run-flat tires on luxury and performance vehicles (e.g., BMW, Mercedes, Tesla) report a transformative improvement in ride quality and noise reduction.
  • Drivers of high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive vehicles frequently highlight the tire's ability to put power down effectively, though some note faster wear on rear axles.
  • Some users with heavy vehicles or specific performance setups noted that the tire's soft sidewall can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during rapid direction changes.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/TeslaModelS ·3 upvotes ·2025-11-25

“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”

r/kereta ·3 upvotes ·2024-05-12

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Positive

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely praised by the community as a premier max performance summer tire, offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise steering feel, and refined road manners for daily driving and spirited street use. While some users note higher pricing and relatively quick wear on heavier vehicles or hot tracks, it remains a benchmark choice that many enthusiasts gladly return to despite alternatives like Continental or Kumho.

r/CarTrackDays ·97 upvotes ·2026-05-04

“Tire condition after 1st track day. PS4s on a GR86 First 2 pics are drivers front, rest pass front. This was at CMP, temps mid 70s, mostly cloudy. Lowered TP to 31psi. Highest I saw on track was 36 psi. The driver side l thought looked good, but passengers side inner looks like they melted. Is this track rubber I picked up or due to mostly turning right on this clockwise circuit?? Also was pleasantly surprised to only have used 1/16 of tread depth after 110 minutes on track. Given what I have read, thought the ps4s would be all used up. Maybe on a hot track surface they would have been eaten up. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·41 upvotes ·2026-03-17

“Am I the owner of the newer PS4s?😁 Hello everyone, new in the sub and just want to share my love for the Pilot Sport 4s. This is the third set and I love it. To me they are the perfect compromise beetween performance anche tyre wear. Last set last me 43k km, I do lot of highway and some spirited drive when possibile. I also had a set of Sport Contact 7, awesome grip, to me better than the PS4s, almost too much for my stock Golf. They also wear out faster. I saw yesterday the review of Potenza Sport Evo and they promise very week, maybe next time I’ll try!”

r/cars ·4 upvotes ·2018-08-21

“I’ll say this. Going from the Pilot Super Sport to the Pilot Sport 4 S of the same size, I’m disappointed in the soft sidewall of the 4 S. This is an 8.5” wide wheel with 235/40/18 tires. The left-right fast slalom action got a bit mushy like the weight transfer was slowed down when I switched to the 4 S. I think a shorter sidewall 4 S would perform better in this way, or the same tire on a 9” wide wheel too. That said, the dry and wet grip is exceptional. To save money, I’d recommend the Continental ExtremeContact Sport.”

r/ft86 ·2 upvotes ·2023-06-01

“Depending on the size they are absolutely overkill for street use on stock motor. I just installed a set of 245 ps4s on 17x9 rpf1s and its almost impossible to trigger the abs and traction co trol. The car is on absolute rails. That being said, if you have the money, there is not really any negatives from that. I intend to use mine on track days. Felt the cup 2s were overkill for 2 to 3 track days a year.”

Top themes
#Dry and Wet Grip#Tread Life and Wear#Price vs Value#Track Performance Limits#Daily Comfort and Noise#Alternatives Comparison

Based on 104 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available68
Rim diameters17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″
UTQG300 A A
SidewallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Michelin

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 86 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 90 vs 75 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 95 vs 81 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 91 vs 80 on dry.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.