Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 95 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 92 |
| SimpleTire owners | 97 | – |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 96% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 87% | 95% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 93% | 87% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 96% | 97% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 49 | 82 |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 84 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 73 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Azenis FK510 | Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 86 |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | 92 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis FK510 | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 89 |
| Dry | 80 | 91 |
| Wet | 85 | 87 |
| Comfort | 62 | 86 |
| Noise | 84 | 84 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 90 |
| Handling | 81 | 95 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 91% #6/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | +8.8 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 92% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | +5 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #10/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 96% #4/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | +2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 90% #4/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 93% #2/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | -3.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 96% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 97% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 86% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 100% #8/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | -14 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 11% #9/10 · 2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tyre Test | 17% #6/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test | -5.6 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #2/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 98% #3/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | -3.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 78% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | -12.2 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 80% #5/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Sports Tyre Test | -20 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 78% #3/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 78% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | -0.2 | Different tests |
| Tyre Weight | Tyre | 93% #5/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test | -5.8 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | 95% #3/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | -7.6 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 93% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 87% #7/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test | +5.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 97% #7/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | -1.8 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong hydroplaning resistance
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
- Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
- Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down
Observations
- Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
- Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely regarded as a benchmark ultra-high-performance summer tire, consistently praised for its exceptional wet and dry grip, confidence-inspiring handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM run-flat alternatives. While most users laud its versatility and safety, some enthusiasts note that its relatively soft sidewalls can result in slightly less steering precision or feedback compared to more track-focused or stiffer-walled competitors.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High levels of ride comfort and reduced road noise
- Predictable handling and stability at high speeds
- Excellent rim protection design
- Strong longevity for a high-performance tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can feel vague or sluggish during aggressive steering inputs
- High price point compared to competitors
- Performance can degrade significantly as the tread wears down
- Reports of sidewall cracking or perishing in some climates
- Not suitable for cold weather or snow
Observations
- Users transitioning from OEM run-flat tires on luxury and performance vehicles (e.g., BMW, Mercedes, Tesla) report a transformative improvement in ride quality and noise reduction.
- Drivers of high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive vehicles frequently highlight the tire's ability to put power down effectively, though some note faster wear on rear axles.
- Some users with heavy vehicles or specific performance setups noted that the tire's soft sidewall can lead to a 'bouncy' or less precise feel during rapid direction changes.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken Azenis FK510
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”
“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”
“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”
Based on 25 community posts
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S is widely praised by the community as a premier max performance summer tire, offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise steering feel, and refined road manners for daily driving and spirited street use. While some users note higher pricing and relatively quick wear on heavier vehicles or hot tracks, it remains a benchmark choice that many enthusiasts gladly return to despite alternatives like Continental or Kumho.
“Tire condition after 1st track day. PS4s on a GR86 First 2 pics are drivers front, rest pass front. This was at CMP, temps mid 70s, mostly cloudy. Lowered TP to 31psi. Highest I saw on track was 36 psi. The driver side l thought looked good, but passengers side inner looks like they melted. Is this track rubber I picked up or due to mostly turning right on this clockwise circuit?? Also was pleasantly surprised to only have used 1/16 of tread depth after 110 minutes on track. Given what I have read, thought the ps4s would be all used up. Maybe on a hot track surface they would have been eaten up. Read more”
“Am I the owner of the newer PS4s?😁 Hello everyone, new in the sub and just want to share my love for the Pilot Sport 4s. This is the third set and I love it. To me they are the perfect compromise beetween performance anche tyre wear. Last set last me 43k km, I do lot of highway and some spirited drive when possibile. I also had a set of Sport Contact 7, awesome grip, to me better than the PS4s, almost too much for my stock Golf. They also wear out faster. I saw yesterday the review of Potenza Sport Evo and they promise very week, maybe next time I’ll try!”
“I’ll say this. Going from the Pilot Super Sport to the Pilot Sport 4 S of the same size, I’m disappointed in the soft sidewall of the 4 S. This is an 8.5” wide wheel with 235/40/18 tires. The left-right fast slalom action got a bit mushy like the weight transfer was slowed down when I switched to the 4 S. I think a shorter sidewall 4 S would perform better in this way, or the same tire on a 9” wide wheel too. That said, the dry and wet grip is exceptional. To save money, I’d recommend the Continental ExtremeContact Sport.”
“Depending on the size they are absolutely overkill for street use on stock motor. I just installed a set of 245 ps4s on 17x9 rpf1s and its almost impossible to trigger the abs and traction co trol. The car is on absolute rails. That being said, if you have the money, there is not really any negatives from that. I intend to use mine on track days. Felt the cup 2s were overkill for 2 to 3 track days a year.”
Based on 104 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis FK510 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 68 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 86 vs 62 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 90 vs 75 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 95 vs 81 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 91 vs 80 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.