Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Pirelli P Zero PZ4 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken Azenis FK510

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Falken Azenis FK510 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
25 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
384 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
85
Comfort
62
Noise
84
Treadwear
75
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Pirelli

Pirelli P Zero PZ4

Summer Max Performance tires

Pirelli P Zero PZ4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
90/100
24 professional tests
User signal (40%)
74/100
99 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
81
Comfort
70
Noise
73
Treadwear
59
Handling
82

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better treadwear, noise and wet. Pick the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 if comfort and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) P Zero PZ4 leads by 7
A — Falken Azenis FK510
80
B — Pirelli P Zero PZ4
87
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510P Zero PZ4
Professional tests (TWG score) 74 87
Tire Rack owners 89 91
Tyre Reviews owners 88 87
SimpleTire owners 97 –
Dry Braking (% of best) 93% 97%
Dry Handling (% of best) 99% 97%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 4
A — Falken Azenis FK510
85
B — Pirelli P Zero PZ4
81
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510P Zero PZ4
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 85
Tire Rack owners 86 82
Tyre Reviews owners 88 75
SimpleTire owners 91 –
Wet Braking (% of best) 82% 94%
Wet Circle (% of best) 99% 98%
Wet Handling (% of best) 94% 95%

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) P Zero PZ4 leads by 8
A — Falken Azenis FK510
62
B — Pirelli P Zero PZ4
70
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510P Zero PZ4
Professional tests (TWG score) 49 70
Tire Rack owners 83 83
Tyre Reviews owners 77 69
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 11
A — Falken Azenis FK510
84
B — Pirelli P Zero PZ4
73
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510P Zero PZ4
Professional tests (TWG score) 73 73
SimpleTire owners 88 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Azenis FK510 leads by 16
A — Falken Azenis FK510
75
B — Pirelli P Zero PZ4
59
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510P Zero PZ4
Tire Rack owners 77 64
Tyre Reviews owners 71 58
SimpleTire owners 80 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) P Zero PZ4 leads by 1
A — Falken Azenis FK510
81
B — Pirelli P Zero PZ4
82
Why this score
SourceAzenis FK510P Zero PZ4
Tyre Reviews owners 81 82
DriverReviews owners 86 –

Scores at a glance

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Pirelli P Zero PZ4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Relative Score 78 74
Dry 80 87
Wet 85 81
Comfort 62 70
Noise 84 73
Treadwear 75 59
Handling 81 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 90% #6/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test 87% #15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +3.3 Different tests
Dry Braking Dry 93% #5/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test 97% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test -4.3 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test 97% #6/9 · 2021 EVO Summer Tyre Test +1.6 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 84% #8/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 84% #7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test -0.6 Different tests
Noise Other 97% #8/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test 96% #3/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test +1.1 Same test
Price Other 84% #5/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test 82% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test +2.2 Different tests
Value Other 59% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #20/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test -40.5 Different tests
Wear Other 97% #3/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 64% #16/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test +32.8 Same test
Overall Ranking Overall 14% #7/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test 17% #6/7 · 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test -2.4 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 98% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test 89% #11/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test +9 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 78% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 98% #3/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test -20.1 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 78% #9/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 64% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Sports Tyre Test +14 Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling Subj 78% #3/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test 97% #2/7 · 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test -18.9 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #19/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 82% #2/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test 94% #3/15 · 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test -11.6 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 99% #6/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test 98% #10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +1.4 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 94% #4/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test 95% #1/7 · 2020 EVO UHP Summer Tyre Test -0.4 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken Azenis FK510

The Falken Azenis FK510 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that frequently outperforms more expensive premium brands in wet and dry traction. While users consistently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and confidence-inspiring grip, the consensus is that these performance benefits come at the cost of accelerated tread wear.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong hydroplaning resistance
  • Predictable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to delayed steering response at high speeds
  • Potential for increased road noise on specific rough road surfaces
  • Susceptibility to tramlining as the tread wears down

Observations

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles and heavy EVs frequently report significantly faster rear tire wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW, Tesla, Mustang) note that while the tire offers excellent grip, the softer sidewall can feel less precise than dedicated track-focused tires during aggressive cornering.
  • Owners of luxury sedans and SUVs often highlight the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and reduce noise compared to factory-fitted run-flat tires.
Tire B Pirelli P Zero PZ4

The Pirelli P Zero PZ4 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering precision, and feedback. While many users praise its sporty character and comfort, consensus is divided regarding its longevity and wet-weather performance, with several reports indicating that grip levels drop significantly as the tread wears or temperatures fall.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and handling precision
  • Excellent steering feedback and road communication
  • High level of acoustic comfort and ride refinement for a UHP tire
  • Effective rim protection design
  • Strong performance when at optimal operating temperature

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Reduced performance and increased noise as tread depth decreases
  • Poor grip and potential for aquaplaning in cold or wet conditions
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage or bulging from road hazards
  • High price point relative to durability

Observations

  • Users with high-torque EVs and performance sedans (e.g., BMW M-series, Audi RS) report significantly faster rear-axle tread wear.
  • OEM-specific versions (e.g., HN for Hyundai, MO for Mercedes) show varied performance characteristics, with some users finding specific manufacturer-tuned compounds to be harsher or more temperature-sensitive.
  • Drivers of heavy vehicles noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on maintaining proper heat, which can be difficult to achieve in daily driving conditions.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

r/TeslaModelS ·3 upvotes ·2025-11-25

“Anyone running Falken Azenis FK510? I bought a lightly used 2022 Model S from Tesla directly back in March of 2025. It came with the 21" Archnids on brand new FK510s. I immediately had the camber shims + an alignment to prevent the inner tear wear. Since then I've driven 11,500 miles on it. I noticed today my front tires look brand new, but the rear tires are completely bald all the way across. I drive in medium ride height and rarely accelerate aggressively. Now I'm wondering if this short lifespan is due to the tires Tesla put on there and if it would make more sense to buy a used set of 19" tempest wheels or replace these tires. Read more”

r/kereta ·3 upvotes ·2024-05-12

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Tire B

Pirelli P Zero PZ4

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Pirelli P Zero PZ4
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available68—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Pirelli

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better treadwear, noise and wet. Pick the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 if comfort and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 75 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 73 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Pirelli P Zero PZ4 scores 70 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Pirelli P Zero PZ4 scores 87 vs 80 on dry.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Pirelli P Zero PZ4

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.