Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Firestone Firehawk GT vs Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Firestone Firehawk GT tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
40/100
Owner ratings
Dry
79
Wet
68
Snow
47
Comfort
60
Noise
55
Treadwear
58
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Michelin

Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2

Winter High Performance tires

Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
67
Wet
66
Snow
82
Comfort
77
Noise
–
Treadwear
92
Handling
50

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 — better snow, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Firestone Firehawk GT if handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk GT leads by 12
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
79
B — Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2
67
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTPilot Alpin PA2
Tire Rack owners 79 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Firehawk GT leads by 2
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
68
B — Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2
66
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTPilot Alpin PA2
Tire Rack owners 68 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 57

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Alpin PA2 leads by 35
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
47
B — Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2
82
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTPilot Alpin PA2
Tire Rack owners 46 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Alpin PA2 leads by 17
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
60
B — Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2
77
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTPilot Alpin PA2
Tire Rack owners 61 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 73

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
55
B — Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Pilot Alpin PA2 leads by 34
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
58
B — Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2
92
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTPilot Alpin PA2
Tire Rack owners 57 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 93

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk GT leads by 28
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
78
B — Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2
50
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTPilot Alpin PA2
Tyre Reviews owners – 50

Scores at a glance

Firestone Firehawk GT vs Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk GTMichelin Pilot Alpin PA2
Relative Score 65 74
Dry 79 67
Wet 68 66
Snow 47 82
Comfort 60 77
Noise 55 –
Treadwear 58 92
Handling 78 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firestone Firehawk GT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2

The Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 receives a largely negative consensus from users, who frequently report unpredictable handling and poor traction in wet and icy conditions. While some users acknowledge the tire's longevity and quiet operation, the lack of feedback and sudden loss of grip significantly undermine driver confidence.

Pros

  • Quiet operation during normal driving
  • Long tread life over multiple winter seasons
  • Acceptable performance in fresh snow

Cons

  • Dangerous loss of grip on wet and greasy road surfaces
  • Poor performance and lack of traction on ice
  • Sudden, unpredictable breakaway characteristics
  • High susceptibility to aquaplaning

Observations

  • Users report that the tire's performance limitations are consistent across both dry and wet asphalt conditions.
  • The tire is noted as being outdated compared to newer iterations like the Pilot Alpin PA3 and PA4.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk GT B · Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2
Category—Winter High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone

Michelin

Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 — better snow, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Firestone Firehawk GT if handling and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 scores 82 vs 47 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 scores 92 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk GT scores 78 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2 scores 77 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk GT
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Alpin PA2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.