Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Firestone Firehawk GT vs Vredestein Sportrac 2 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Firestone Firehawk GT tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
40/100
Owner ratings
Dry
79
Wet
68
Snow
47
Comfort
60
Noise
55
Treadwear
58
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Vredestein

Vredestein Sportrac 2

Summer High Performance tires

Vredestein Sportrac 2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
7 owner reviews
Dry
76
Wet
86
Snow
–
Comfort
66
Noise
–
Treadwear
87
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Vredestein Sportrac 2 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Firestone Firehawk GT if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk GT leads by 3
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
79
B — Vredestein Sportrac 2
76
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTSportrac 2
Tire Rack owners 79 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 76

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Sportrac 2 leads by 18
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
68
B — Vredestein Sportrac 2
86
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTSportrac 2
Tire Rack owners 68 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 86

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
47
B — Vredestein Sportrac 2
–
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTSportrac 2
Tire Rack owners 46 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sportrac 2 leads by 6
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
60
B — Vredestein Sportrac 2
66
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTSportrac 2
Tire Rack owners 61 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 66

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
55
B — Vredestein Sportrac 2
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Sportrac 2 leads by 29
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
58
B — Vredestein Sportrac 2
87
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTSportrac 2
Tire Rack owners 57 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 87

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sportrac 2 leads by 1
A — Firestone Firehawk GT
78
B — Vredestein Sportrac 2
79
Why this score
SourceFirehawk GTSportrac 2
Tyre Reviews owners – 79

Scores at a glance

Firestone Firehawk GT vs Vredestein Sportrac 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk GTVredestein Sportrac 2
Relative Score 67 81
Dry 79 76
Wet 68 86
Snow 47 –
Comfort 60 66
Noise 55 –
Treadwear 58 87
Handling 78 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firestone Firehawk GT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Vredestein Sportrac 2

The Vredestein Sportrac 2 receives a polarized reception, with many users praising its exceptional wet weather performance, predictable handling, and impressive longevity. However, a segment of users reports significant dissatisfaction regarding road noise and a lack of steering precision, suggesting that the tire's performance characteristics may vary depending on driving style and vehicle application.

Pros

  • Excellent wet weather grip and braking performance
  • High durability and long tread life
  • Predictable and responsive handling characteristics
  • Good value for the price point

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, particularly during deceleration
  • Lack of steering feedback and precision for spirited driving
  • Inconsistent performance reports among different users

Observations

  • Long-term users on older, heavier sedans like the Ford Granada reported excellent traction across various weather conditions, including ice and snow.
  • Some users noted that the tire's comfort-oriented construction may lead to a 'soft' feel that sacrifices handling precision.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk GT B · Vredestein Sportrac 2
Category—Summer High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone

Vredestein

Winner: Vredestein Sportrac 2 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Firestone Firehawk GT if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Sportrac 2 scores 87 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Sportrac 2 scores 86 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Sportrac 2 scores 66 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk GT scores 79 vs 76 on dry.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk GT
Tire B · Vredestein Sportrac 2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.