82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Vredestein Sportrac 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Continental ContiSport Attack and Vredestein Sportrac 2 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSport Attack is stronger on comfort, dry and handling. Vredestein Sportrac 2 is stronger on treadwear and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Sportrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Sportrac 2 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Sportrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 86 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Sportrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 66 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Sportrac 2 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Sportrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Sportrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 79 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Vredestein Sportrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 81 |
| Dry | 94 | 76 |
| Wet | 74 | 86 |
| Comfort | 86 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 87 |
| Handling | 91 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiSport Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling, cornering stability, and predictable feedback. While users consistently praise its track-capable grip and agility, there is a clear divide regarding longevity, with some riders experiencing rapid tread wear depending on bike weight and riding style.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
- Strong performance on track and spirited canyon riding
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Observations
- Lighter motorcycles like the Suzuki SV650 report significantly better mileage (up to 12,500km front) compared to high-output sportbikes like the ZX10R.
- Users noted that the tire's performance profile is better suited for canyon carving and track use than for high-mileage commuting.
The Vredestein Sportrac 2 receives a polarized reception, with many users praising its exceptional wet weather performance, predictable handling, and impressive longevity. However, a segment of users reports significant dissatisfaction regarding road noise and a lack of steering precision, suggesting that the tire's performance characteristics may vary depending on driving style and vehicle application.
Pros
- Excellent wet weather grip and braking performance
- High durability and long tread life
- Predictable and responsive handling characteristics
- Good value for the price point
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, particularly during deceleration
- Lack of steering feedback and precision for spirited driving
- Inconsistent performance reports among different users
Observations
- Long-term users on older, heavier sedans like the Ford Granada reported excellent traction across various weather conditions, including ice and snow.
- Some users noted that the tire's comfort-oriented construction may lead to a 'soft' feel that sacrifices handling precision.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Vredestein Sportrac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Continental
81
/ 100
Vredestein
Too close to call: Continental ContiSport Attack and Vredestein Sportrac 2 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSport Attack is stronger on comfort, dry and handling. Vredestein Sportrac 2 is stronger on treadwear and wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 86 vs 66 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 94 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Sportrac 2 scores 87 vs 74 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 91 vs 79 on handling.
Tire A · Continental ContiSport Attack
Tire B · Vredestein Sportrac 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiSport Attack also compared with
Vredestein Sportrac 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.