Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs General G-MAX RS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Firestone

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
1,452 owner reviews
Dry
93
Wet
84
Snow
63
Comfort
85
Noise
87
Treadwear
81
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
General G-MAX RS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
491 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
87
Snow
40
Comfort
85
Noise
78
Treadwear
84
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better snow, noise and dry. Pick the General G-MAX RS if wet and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 3
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
93
B — General G-MAX RS
90
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500G-MAX RS
Tire Rack owners 93 90
Tyre Reviews owners 84 80
SimpleTire owners 96 96
America's Tire owners – 95

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) G-MAX RS leads by 3
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
84
B — General G-MAX RS
87
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500G-MAX RS
Tire Rack owners 84 87
Tyre Reviews owners 69 80
SimpleTire owners 85 90
America's Tire owners – 89

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 23
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
63
B — General G-MAX RS
40
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500G-MAX RS
SimpleTire owners 63 40

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
85
B — General G-MAX RS
85
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500G-MAX RS
Tire Rack owners 85 85
Tyre Reviews owners 75 50
SimpleTire owners 91 88
America's Tire owners – 93

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 9
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
87
B — General G-MAX RS
78
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500G-MAX RS
SimpleTire owners 87 78
America's Tire owners – 88

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) G-MAX RS leads by 3
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
81
B — General G-MAX RS
84
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500G-MAX RS
Tire Rack owners 81 84
Tyre Reviews owners 65 60
SimpleTire owners 86 85
America's Tire owners – 91

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
83
B — General G-MAX RS
83
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500G-MAX RS
Tyre Reviews owners 83 65
America's Tire owners – 94

Scores at a glance

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs General G-MAX RS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk Indy 500General G-MAX RS
Relative Score 82 79
Dry 93 90
Wet 84 87
Snow 63 40
Comfort 85 85
Noise 87 78
Treadwear 81 84
Handling 83 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

The Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is widely regarded as a premier 'bang-for-the-buck' ultra-high-performance summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional dry grip, sharp steering response, and aggressive aesthetic, often noting that it performs at a level comparable to significantly more expensive premium tires. While some users report concerns regarding tread life and wet-weather hydroplaning resistance, the general consensus is that it offers an unbeatable value proposition for spirited daily driving.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Aggressive, sporty tread design
  • Responsive steering and predictable handling characteristics
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride for a performance tire

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially with aggressive driving
  • Reduced hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain or deep standing water
  • Poor performance and potential for flat-spotting in cold temperatures
  • Some reports of sidewall softness or 'mushy' feel under extreme load

Observations

  • Users with high-horsepower RWD vehicles (e.g., Mustangs, Camaros, Chargers) frequently report improved launch traction compared to OEM tires.
  • Drivers of smaller, lightweight sports cars (e.g., Miata, BRZ, Mini) often highlight the tire's ability to transform handling and steering precision.
  • Some users noted that the tire runs slightly narrow for its stated size, leading to less rim protection and a 'stretched' look on wider wheels.
Tire B General G-MAX RS

The General G-Max RS is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance summer tire that offers impressive dry and wet traction at a significantly lower price point than premium competitors like Michelin. While most users praise its daily driving comfort, quietness, and predictable handling, some enthusiasts note that it lacks the razor-sharp steering response and ultimate track-day grip of more expensive, top-tier performance tires.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong wet and dry traction
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise
  • Predictable handling characteristics for daily and spirited driving
  • Good tread life compared to other summer performance tires

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' or less precise feel during aggressive cornering
  • Reports of flat-spotting after the vehicle sits for extended periods
  • Some users report increased road noise as the tire wears
  • Not intended for track-focused use; can overheat or lose grip under extreme conditions
  • Occasional reports of balancing issues or out-of-round tires

Observations

  • Users with high-horsepower vehicles (400+ hp) often note that the tire can struggle to maintain traction during hard acceleration compared to dedicated track compounds.
  • Owners of vehicles transitioning from run-flat tires consistently report a massive improvement in ride quality and comfort.
  • Drivers on 16-inch or smaller wheels appreciate the availability of this tire in sizes where other performance options are limited.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Positive

Community opinion on the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is largely positive, praising it as an affordable, high-performing summer tire with great dry grip, impressive wet performance for its price class, and good ride comfort. While some enthusiasts note a slightly softer sidewall response compared to more expensive tier-one options like Michelins, the overwhelming consensus highlights its exceptional value.

r/FiestaST ·22 upvotes ·2018-04-09

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”

r/MINI ·20 upvotes ·2025-05-02

“Firehawk Indy 500s As promised, some initial thoughts. These are extremely comfortable. They honestly made it hard to understand how fast I was going because I've come to gauge my speed based on how much I'm being jostled around. I felt almost nothing with these, and there's so much construction on my way to work from the tire place, including a road that hasn't been surfaced properly yet. Perfect testing run for comfort. In terms of performance these bite the road a lot better and it's a lot easier for me to get moving again. Granted, my run flats were almost bald and that's my most recent memory of how they performed, but it's shocking how much I can take a turn or even just accelerate without any risk of sliding or slipping. It feels like a completely different car honestly, and people aren't kidding when they say "just get better tires" on some of these posts asking about mods. It's not as sexy as a new intake, but it makes a much bigger difference. I mean I feel like I was missing out on at least half of my roadster's potential here. So yeah I definitely like them. I don't mean to insult the tire guys' ability to apply tire shine, but I need to redo that disaster when I'm home. I only have detailing spray right now.”

r/Mustang ·7 upvotes ·2025-02-13

“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”

r/S2000 ·4 upvotes ·2025-06-04

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 reviews Hi all! First post here on Reddit for S2K. I have a 2002 with 80k (130 km's) that is 100% stock. I recently purchased some new tires moving from a Potenza RE-71 (rear) Potenza RE760 (front) I bought the Indy 500 Firehawk since a lot of S2K owners say they are an excellent tire, perfect for the S2K with a ton of great qualities. So far I am thinking a little bit of a mixxed bag. The tires are not as responsive as I thought and don't inspire the same level of cornering confidence. The seem a little mushy/soft and my rear end thus far doesn't seem as firmly planted as I would like. Almost kind of wobbly? Alignment is fine, tires are brand new with less than 100 miles on them and tire pressure is factory spec within 1 psi. The DOT code for the tires is late 2024 so brand new. I don't track the car and these days just baby it around town mostly so the tires use should fine for my use. Thanks! Leer más”

Top themes
#Value and Pricing#Dry and Wet Grip#Ride Comfort and Noise#Sidewall Response and Feel#Comparison to Premium Brands

Based on 27 community posts

Tire B

General G-MAX RS

Positive

The General G-Max RS is generally praised by community members as a high-value, budget-friendly alternative to premium summer tires like Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. Drivers report strong dry grip and cornering confidence, though some note drawbacks such as tire noise compared to more expensive options. Overall, they are viewed as a compelling choice for daily driving and enthusiastic street use without breaking the bank.

r/mazda3 ·19 upvotes ·2019-07-04

“Been driving on the General G-Max RS 225's for about a month now and it feels like I'm glued to the road. Now I just need to install my Corksport rear sway bar for even more cornering fun!”

r/GolfGTI ·3 upvotes ·2023-04-12

“Price no object? Michelin 100%. I have the Generals right now and while they're fine for grip and what not, they are very noisy. I have Michelin X Ice winter tires, and even with the aggressive winter tread, they are considerably quieter than my g-max rs. However I paid about 700 CAD for my set of g-max a couple years ago. So for a price like that, I'm happy. Like anything, expect to get what you pay for.”

r/tires ·3 upvotes ·2024-09-10

“G-max rs I put 7k miles on these tires and this is the front how many miles would you say I have before problems occur I plan on replacing in a few weeks Read more”

r/370z ·2 upvotes ·2018-03-31

“General G-Max RS tires I know they just came out in February 2018 but was wondering if anyone else has had experiences with them yet. From what I’ve dug up, they’re OEM on the new Saleen Mustang. Rated at 360AA. I bring this up because that’s what the dealer has given me after an unfortunate alignment issue with my old tires. Yes I went to the dealer because I trust very few people to work on my car and can afford a little extra. So far these tires haven’t disappointed me but it’s day 1. Highway driving felt very smooth and I hugged the corners going faster than... everyone else. Later today I’m going to take my empty backroad and see how they are in tight turns. General announced these tires are UHP Summer tires meant to attract customers for track and autocross. The only thing that holds me back a little on the throttle is the price tag is SOOO cheap, which is exactly what they wanted. If you have experience with them go ahead and post up please. Read more”

Top themes
#value and pricing#dry and wet grip#compared to michelin#daily driving comfort#road noise levels#cornering performance

Based on 12 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 B · General G-MAX RS
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available4748
Rim diameters16″ – 20″16″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″10/32″
UTQG340 A A360 - 700 A - AA A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi50 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone

General

Winner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better snow, noise and dry. Pick the General G-MAX RS if wet and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 63 vs 40 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 87 vs 78 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 93 vs 90 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

General G-MAX RS scores 87 vs 84 on wet.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Tire B · General G-MAX RS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.