Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Kumho Ecsta PS91 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Firestone

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
1,452 owner reviews
Dry
93
Wet
84
Snow
63
Comfort
85
Noise
87
Treadwear
81
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS91 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
70/100
56 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
78
Snow
Comfort
52
Noise
87
Treadwear
57
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 11
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
93
B — Kumho Ecsta PS91
82
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta PS91
Professional tests (TWG score) 81
Tire Rack owners 93 87
Tyre Reviews owners 84 82
SimpleTire owners 96

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 6
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
84
B — Kumho Ecsta PS91
78
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta PS91
Professional tests (TWG score) 80
Tire Rack owners 84 77
Tyre Reviews owners 69 73
SimpleTire owners 85

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
63
B — Kumho Ecsta PS91
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta PS91
SimpleTire owners 63

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 33
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
85
B — Kumho Ecsta PS91
52
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta PS91
Professional tests (TWG score) 37
Tire Rack owners 85 80
Tyre Reviews owners 75 73
SimpleTire owners 91

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
87
B — Kumho Ecsta PS91
87
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta PS91
Professional tests (TWG score) 87
SimpleTire owners 87

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 24
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
81
B — Kumho Ecsta PS91
57
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta PS91
Tire Rack owners 81 64
Tyre Reviews owners 65 55
SimpleTire owners 86

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Firehawk Indy 500 leads by 8
A — Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
83
B — Kumho Ecsta PS91
75
Why this score
SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta PS91
Tyre Reviews owners 83 75
DriverReviews owners 80

Scores at a glance

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Kumho Ecsta PS91: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk Indy 500Kumho Ecsta PS91
Relative Score 85 71
Dry 93 82
Wet 84 78
Snow 63
Comfort 85 52
Noise 87 87
Treadwear 81 57
Handling 83 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

The Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is widely regarded as a premier 'bang-for-the-buck' ultra-high-performance summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional dry grip, sharp steering response, and aggressive aesthetic, often noting that it performs at a level comparable to significantly more expensive premium tires. While some users report concerns regarding tread life and wet-weather hydroplaning resistance, the general consensus is that it offers an unbeatable value proposition for spirited daily driving.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Aggressive, sporty tread design
  • Responsive steering and predictable handling characteristics
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride for a performance tire

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially with aggressive driving
  • Reduced hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain or deep standing water
  • Poor performance and potential for flat-spotting in cold temperatures
  • Some reports of sidewall softness or 'mushy' feel under extreme load

Observations

  • Users with high-horsepower RWD vehicles (e.g., Mustangs, Camaros, Chargers) frequently report improved launch traction compared to OEM tires.
  • Drivers of smaller, lightweight sports cars (e.g., Miata, BRZ, Mini) often highlight the tire's ability to transform handling and steering precision.
  • Some users noted that the tire runs slightly narrow for its stated size, leading to less rim protection and a 'stretched' look on wider wheels.
Tire B Kumho Ecsta PS91

The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive dry grip and steering feedback, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. However, user consensus is polarized regarding tread longevity, with many owners reporting premature wear, and some experiencing inconsistent performance in wet conditions or issues with sidewall durability.

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Stiff sidewalls provide sharp, responsive steering feedback
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-torque vehicles
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance and aquaplaning susceptibility
  • Reports of sidewall cracking or deformation after moderate use
  • Tendency to tramline or follow road ruts on highway surfaces

Observations

  • Owners of heavy, high-torque vehicles (e.g., BMW 5-series, performance saloons) frequently report significantly accelerated tread wear.
  • BMW and Mini owners transitioning from factory run-flat tires often praise the PS91 for improved comfort and steering feel due to its specific sidewall construction.
  • Some users noted that the tire's actual width when inflated can be narrower than the nominal size, leading to fitment or aesthetic concerns.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Positive

Community opinion on the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is largely positive, praising it as an affordable, high-performing summer tire with great dry grip, impressive wet performance for its price class, and good ride comfort. While some enthusiasts note a slightly softer sidewall response compared to more expensive tier-one options like Michelins, the overwhelming consensus highlights its exceptional value.

r/FiestaST ·22 upvotes ·2018-04-09

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”

r/MINI ·20 upvotes ·2025-05-02

“Firehawk Indy 500s As promised, some initial thoughts. These are extremely comfortable. They honestly made it hard to understand how fast I was going because I've come to gauge my speed based on how much I'm being jostled around. I felt almost nothing with these, and there's so much construction on my way to work from the tire place, including a road that hasn't been surfaced properly yet. Perfect testing run for comfort. In terms of performance these bite the road a lot better and it's a lot easier for me to get moving again. Granted, my run flats were almost bald and that's my most recent memory of how they performed, but it's shocking how much I can take a turn or even just accelerate without any risk of sliding or slipping. It feels like a completely different car honestly, and people aren't kidding when they say "just get better tires" on some of these posts asking about mods. It's not as sexy as a new intake, but it makes a much bigger difference. I mean I feel like I was missing out on at least half of my roadster's potential here. So yeah I definitely like them. I don't mean to insult the tire guys' ability to apply tire shine, but I need to redo that disaster when I'm home. I only have detailing spray right now.”

r/Mustang ·7 upvotes ·2025-02-13

“Will I regret buying Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s? I have a stock '21 GT Premium convertible with the black appearance package. It came with the upgraded Pirelli P Zero 255/40-19 tires, but with 35,000 miles, they are really worn, and I need new tires. I live in North Florida. We don't have a lot of cold weather (I missed the snow last month), but I do get a lot of rain. I don't track the car, and mostly drive on country roads and the interstate. The Pirelli's have treated me well as far as traction, dry and wet. I like the aggressive look of the Firehawks, but I am concerned about wet weather traction. Will the Firehawks be at least comparable to the Pirelli's for wet weather and general handling? If not, it sounds like the Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 is the way to go. Also, the car is all black, with black rims, and the tires look wimpy. I'm not up for new rims this go-round, and I won't lower it because I like the clearance for potholes, etc., that I see a lot of in my area. I'm hoping the tires will help the look a little bit. Read more”

r/S2000 ·4 upvotes ·2025-06-04

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 reviews Hi all! First post here on Reddit for S2K. I have a 2002 with 80k (130 km's) that is 100% stock. I recently purchased some new tires moving from a Potenza RE-71 (rear) Potenza RE760 (front) I bought the Indy 500 Firehawk since a lot of S2K owners say they are an excellent tire, perfect for the S2K with a ton of great qualities. So far I am thinking a little bit of a mixxed bag. The tires are not as responsive as I thought and don't inspire the same level of cornering confidence. The seem a little mushy/soft and my rear end thus far doesn't seem as firmly planted as I would like. Almost kind of wobbly? Alignment is fine, tires are brand new with less than 100 miles on them and tire pressure is factory spec within 1 psi. The DOT code for the tires is late 2024 so brand new. I don't track the car and these days just baby it around town mostly so the tires use should fine for my use. Thanks! Leer más”

Top themes
#Value and Pricing#Dry and Wet Grip#Ride Comfort and Noise#Sidewall Response and Feel#Comparison to Premium Brands

Based on 27 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Mixed

Community opinion on the Kumho Ecsta PS91 is generally mixed, praising them as a budget-friendly, good-looking max performance summer tire that rivals premium brands in daily driving comfort and appearance. However, multiple users note concerns regarding rapid tread wear, poor heat capacity under track conditions, and susceptibility to degrading under hard abuse compared to dedicated 200 treadwear or extreme performance tires.

r/e46 ·222 upvotes ·2025-03-27

“Follow up on new wheels/tires for ZHP Well new wheels and tires are on aswell as aligned. I love the tire and fitment setup but really do not like the gunmetal grey color especially on imola. I will feel it out for a while but probably eventually powder coat to OEM silver. Wheels specs are 18 x 8.5 x ET50 with 255/35/18 Kuhmo Ecsta PS91 all around. -2.5 camber in the front and -2.8 in the rear.”

r/E90 ·180 upvotes ·2025-09-17

“New meaty tires set up installed, now I can order spacers Went up tire sizes and they definitely fill the gap a bit. First time running sticky kumhos on anytime so excited to see how they turn out.Specs are Kumho Ecsta Ps91 235/40/18 up front and 265/40/18 in the rear. Read more”

r/e46 ·39 upvotes ·2025-03-26

“New wheels and tires for my ZHP My old wheels were super beat up and tires were showing wire so I figured I’d upgrade both. Was able to get these freshly powder coated squared set (18/8.5/et 50). Im excited to feel the Kuhmo Ecsta PS91 as they are a budget friendly performance tire. 255/35/18 tires all around”

r/G37 ·30 upvotes ·2026-03-21

“275/40 Square Can Fit on a Sedan Shout out to TireRack for having great information on actual tire size. Ecsta PS91 265/40 and ExtremeContact 275/40 has a tread width and section width difference of 0.1” and 0.2” respectively. Tires fit just about perfect. No rubbing so far, and don’t expect it to rub bc of the relatively minimal width change Really goes to show that tire brand matters for fitment Read more”

Top themes
#budget friendly performance#ride quality and comfort#tread wear longevity#track and heat performance#tire mixing risks#fitment and appearance

Based on 16 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 B · Kumho Ecsta PS91
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Extreme Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available47
Rim diameters16″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″
UTQG340 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone

Kumho

Winner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 85 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 81 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 93 vs 82 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 83 vs 75 on handling.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS91

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.