Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
General Altimax Arctic 12 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 17 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 43 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 59 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 60 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 85 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 50 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Altimax Arctic 12 | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Altimax Arctic 12 | Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 64 |
| Dry | 45 | 75 |
| Wet | 61 | 75 |
| Snow | 74 | – |
| Comfort | 86 | 60 |
| Noise | 83 | – |
| Treadwear | 86 | 50 |
| Handling | 80 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The General Altimax Arctic 12 is widely regarded as a high-value, top-tier winter tire that excels in deep snow, slush, and icy conditions. While users note some expected trade-offs in dry pavement handling and increased road noise, the consensus highlights its exceptional longevity and performance-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow, slush, and ice
- Exceptional tread life and durability for a winter-specific tire
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands like Nokian or Bridgestone
- Reliable performance across a diverse range of vehicles, from small sedans to heavy trucks
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise, particularly as the tire wears
- Softer sidewalls leading to 'squishy' or less precise handling on dry pavement
- Slightly higher rolling resistance resulting in a minor decrease in fuel economy
- Reduced grip on dry and wet pavement compared to dedicated all-season or summer tires
Observations
- Drivers of RWD vehicles, such as the BMW Z4, reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain control in harsh winter conditions.
- Users with light-weight vehicles (e.g., Chevy HHR) and heavy-duty trucks (e.g., Ram, F-150) both report consistent, reliable traction in deep snow.
- The XL-rated versions provide a robust, beefy sidewall that some users appreciate for sport-tuned suspensions.
The Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 receives a highly critical assessment from the user, who reports poor performance across all road conditions and premature tread wear after only one season of light use. The reviewer expresses significant dissatisfaction, citing a complete lack of confidence in the tire's safety and reliability.
Cons
- Extremely rapid tread wear
- Poor traction on ice and snow
- Inadequate handling on wet and dry surfaces
- Lack of driver confidence in slippery conditions
Observations
- The user reported that the tire failed to last even a single season despite primarily city-based, low-mileage driving.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Altimax Arctic 12 | B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 38 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
General
Yokohama
Winner: General Altimax Arctic 12 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 if dry and wet matter most to you.
General Altimax Arctic 12 scores 86 vs 50 on treadwear.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 scores 75 vs 45 on dry.
General Altimax Arctic 12 scores 86 vs 60 on comfort.
General Altimax Arctic 12 scores 80 vs 65 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.