85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter vs General Altimax Arctic — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter and General Altimax Arctic are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter is stronger on snow. General Altimax Arctic is stronger on wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 92 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 67 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 10 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 96 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 57 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 81 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Altimax Arctic leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 53 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 50 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter | General Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 85 |
| Dry | 85 | 87 |
| Wet | 81 | 86 |
| Snow | 100 | 88 |
| Comfort | 84 | 86 |
| Noise | – | 83 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 84 |
| Handling | 78 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
85
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter is widely regarded as a high-performing, value-oriented winter tire that excels in deep snow, ice, and cold, wet conditions. While most users praise its exceptional traction and reliability in harsh climates, some report concerns regarding sidewall softness, noise levels, and long-term durability.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow and icy conditions
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Strong performance in cold, wet, and slushy environments
- Reliable handling on steep or challenging terrain
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and a 'wobbly' feel on dry pavement
- Increased noise levels reported by some users
- Inconsistent long-term durability, with reports of premature deformation or wear
- Performance degrades significantly in temperatures above 6-7 degrees Celsius
Observations
- Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles, such as the BMW E46, noted a significant improvement in mobility during winter conditions.
- Drivers using smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) reported high confidence and excellent water displacement on rural roads.
The General AltiMAX Arctic is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that delivers exceptional traction in snow, slush, and ice. While some users note a slight increase in road noise and a softer feel in dry conditions, the consensus is that it offers performance comparable to premium brands at a significantly more accessible price point.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and icy conditions
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium winter tire brands
- Impressive tread longevity for a dedicated winter compound
- Reliable handling and braking performance in cold-weather environments
Cons
- Increased road noise, particularly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewall feel leading to less precise handling on dry pavement
- Potential for minor understeer during aggressive cornering
- Not intended for year-round use, as dry performance is compromised
Observations
- Owners of RWD vehicles, including sports roadsters, report high confidence in deep snow and winter conditions.
- Users with light-weight vehicles (e.g., Chevy HHR, FWD Civics) report excellent starting and stopping capability on slippery surfaces.
- Drivers of heavy-duty trucks and SUVs appreciate the durability and load-handling capabilities of the tire's construction.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter | B · General Altimax Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Winter tire | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
85
/ 100
BFGoodrich
85
/ 100
General
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter and General Altimax Arctic are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter is stronger on snow. General Altimax Arctic is stronger on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter scores 100 vs 88 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Altimax Arctic scores 86 vs 81 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter
Tire B · General Altimax Arctic
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter also compared with
General Altimax Arctic also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.