85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter vs Continental AllSeasonContact — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
93/100
28 professional tests
User signal (40%)
81/100
42 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter — better snow, treadwear and dry. Pick the Continental AllSeasonContact if wet and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AllSeasonContact leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 86 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 85 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AllSeasonContact leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 83 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 76 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
AllSeasonContact leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter | AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter | Continental AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 81 |
| Dry | 85 | 79 |
| Wet | 81 | 86 |
| Snow | 100 | 79 |
| Comfort | 84 | 85 |
| Noise | – | 80 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 76 |
| Handling | 78 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
85
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter is widely regarded as a high-performing, value-oriented winter tire that excels in deep snow, ice, and cold, wet conditions. While most users praise its exceptional traction and reliability in harsh climates, some report concerns regarding sidewall softness, noise levels, and long-term durability.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow and icy conditions
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Strong performance in cold, wet, and slushy environments
- Reliable handling on steep or challenging terrain
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and a 'wobbly' feel on dry pavement
- Increased noise levels reported by some users
- Inconsistent long-term durability, with reports of premature deformation or wear
- Performance degrades significantly in temperatures above 6-7 degrees Celsius
Observations
- Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles, such as the BMW E46, noted a significant improvement in mobility during winter conditions.
- Drivers using smaller rim sizes (e.g., 15-inch) reported high confidence and excellent water displacement on rural roads.
The Continental AllSeasonContact is widely regarded as a highly capable, balanced all-season tire that excels in wet and wintry conditions while maintaining respectable dry-road performance. Users frequently praise its superior steering feedback and confidence-inspiring grip in adverse weather, often positioning it as a strong competitor to the Michelin CrossClimate series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding tread longevity in hot climates and occasional noise issues.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and snow traction
- Predictable and stable handling characteristics
- High level of ride comfort and cabin refinement
- Precise steering feedback compared to segment rivals
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear in high-temperature summer conditions
- Occasional reports of road noise or specific frequency whining
- Mixed feedback on dry-road performance during extreme heat
- Some reports of premature tread cracking or durability issues
Observations
- Users with SUVs and heavier vehicles noted significant improvements in cabin noise and ride comfort compared to OE tires.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or AWD vehicles (e.g., Audi Quattro, Subaru Outback) report high confidence in snow and slush, though some note that aggressive acceleration can still break traction.
- Owners in hot climates (e.g., Greece, Southern Europe) report that the tire compound feels too soft during summer, leading to reduced handling precision and faster wear.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter | B · Continental AllSeasonContact |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Winter tire | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
85
/ 100
BFGoodrich
81
/ 100
Continental
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter — better snow, treadwear and dry. Pick the Continental AllSeasonContact if wet and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter scores 100 vs 79 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter scores 83 vs 76 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter scores 85 vs 79 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental AllSeasonContact scores 86 vs 81 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter
Tire B · Continental AllSeasonContact
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter also compared with
Continental AllSeasonContact also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.