91
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
92/100
172 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 vs Michelin Energy X2+ — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Assurance Triplemax 2 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Triplemax 2 | Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 89 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Assurance Triplemax 2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Triplemax 2 | Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 87 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Assurance Triplemax 2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Triplemax 2 | Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Assurance Triplemax 2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Triplemax 2 | Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Assurance Triplemax 2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Assurance Triplemax 2 | Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 89 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 91 | 88 |
| Dry | 95 | 89 |
| Wet | 92 | 87 |
| Comfort | 91 | 87 |
| Noise | 92 | – |
| Treadwear | 89 | 87 |
| Handling | 91 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
91
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry braking and handling. While users consistently praise its confidence-inspiring grip and stability, the consensus is tempered by reports of increased road noise as the tread wears and a ride quality that some find stiffer than premium competitors.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry braking performance
- Strong cornering stability and handling confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Effective hydroplaning resistance
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Stiff ride quality that transmits road imperfections
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Potential decline in wet weather performance as tread depth decreases
Observations
- Users on smaller hatchbacks and sedans (e.g., Proton, Honda Fit) report excellent handling characteristics, though some note the tire feels 'crashy' over potholes.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with stiffer suspensions report that the tire's firm sidewall can lead to a harsh ride on rough surfaces.
The Michelin Energy XM2+ is widely regarded as a high-performing, durable tire that excels in wet weather conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride. Users consistently praise its ability to balance longevity with responsive handling, making it a reliable choice for daily driving across various road surfaces.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Responsive steering and improved handling characteristics
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Observations
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted tires on compact sedans report significant improvements in steering response and high-speed stability.
- Drivers of MPVs and SUVs noted that the tire maintains excellent composure and prevents aquaplaning even when driving through deep water at highway speeds.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 | B · Michelin Energy X2+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
91
/ 100
Goodyear
88
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 scores 95 vs 89 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 scores 92 vs 87 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 scores 91 vs 87 on comfort.
Tire A · Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2
Tire B · Michelin Energy X2+
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Assurance Triplemax 2 also compared with
Michelin Energy X2+ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.