88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy X2+ vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Energy X2+ leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Energy X2+ | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy X2+ | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 80 |
| Dry | 89 | 83 |
| Wet | 87 | 78 |
| Comfort | 87 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 75 |
| Handling | 89 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy XM2+ is widely regarded as a high-performing, durable tire that excels in wet weather conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride. Users consistently praise its ability to balance longevity with responsive handling, making it a reliable choice for daily driving across various road surfaces.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and water displacement capabilities
- High durability and long tread life due to the hard compound construction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Responsive steering and improved handling characteristics
Cons
- Slightly firmer ride quality when using lower sidewall profiles
- Potential for increased road feedback depending on vehicle suspension setup
- Wet grip ratings are occasionally perceived as slightly lower than dry grip performance
Observations
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted tires on compact sedans report significant improvements in steering response and high-speed stability.
- Drivers of MPVs and SUVs noted that the tire maintains excellent composure and prevents aquaplaning even when driving through deep water at highway speeds.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy X2+ | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
Michelin
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Energy X2+ — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 87 vs 75 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 87 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 89 vs 81 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Energy X2+ scores 89 vs 83 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Energy X2+
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy X2+ also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.