Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 85 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 97% | 99% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 81 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 93% | 94% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 62% | 93% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 99% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 88% | 94% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | 75 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 82 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 77 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 81 |
| Dry | 87 | 87 |
| Wet | 82 | 83 |
| Comfort | 83 | 77 |
| Noise | 70 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 91 | 82 |
| Handling | 84 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 98% #4/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | 86% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +12.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #2/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 97% #5/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -1.5 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #4/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres | 99% #10/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | -1.9 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 92% #5/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | 84% #4/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test | +8.1 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 97% #26/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 98% #33/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -1.7 | Same test |
| Abrasion | Other | 51% #2/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 47% #1/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +3.7 | Same test |
| Noise | Other | 98% #10/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #3/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test | -0.3 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 84% #8/12 · 2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test | 100% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -16.1 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 42% #2/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 52% #16/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -10.4 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 100% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 92% #2/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +8.4 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 100% #1/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 20% #5/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested | +80 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #6/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test | 98% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | -3.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested | 0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 96% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 80% #8/13 · 2019 Swedish Summer Tyre Test | +16 | Different tests |
| Subj. Noise | Subj | 100% #1/8 · 2021 ViBilagare Summer Tyre Test | 60% #7/8 · 2021 ViBilagare Summer Tyre Test | +40 | Same test |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 92% #3/12 · 2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test | 80% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | +12 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #1/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #5/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Tyre Weight | Tyre | 78% #4/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 74% #2/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +3.1 | Same test |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #7/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | 94% #5/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | -0.9 | Same test |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 62% #5/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 93% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -30.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% #2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test | 100% #7/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | -0.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 88% #1/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres | 94% #6/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested | -6.1 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is widely regarded as a premier touring tire, consistently praised for its exceptional longevity, comfort, and low noise levels. While most users report a transformative improvement in ride quality and fuel efficiency compared to OEM tires, a minority of drivers note a 'vague' steering feel due to soft sidewalls and occasional reports of increased noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Significant improvement over factory-fitted eco-tires
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback and body roll
- Reported increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Not suitable for aggressive or sporty driving styles
- Occasional reports of structural issues or vibration at higher mileages
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and diesel estates report impressive mileage, often exceeding 40,000 miles.
- Drivers of vehicles with stiff 'sports' suspension noted that the tire's soft sidewall helps significantly with comfort, though it reduces steering precision.
- Some users on 16-inch and 17-inch wheels noted that the tire's comfort-oriented design makes the vehicle feel less 'sharp' compared to UHP alternatives.
The Michelin Primacy 4 is widely regarded as a premium, long-lasting touring tire that excels in comfort, noise reduction, and consistent wet-weather performance. While it is highly praised for its longevity and safety, some enthusiasts find its handling 'floaty' or lacking in road feedback compared to sport-oriented tires, leading to a polarized experience depending on driving style.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Consistent performance even as the tire wears
- Strong wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
Cons
- Vague steering feel and lack of road feedback
- Soft sidewalls can feel 'mushy' or 'floaty' during spirited driving
- High price point compared to competitors
- Increased noise levels as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or EVs often report a 'floaty' sensation, which some mitigate by increasing tire pressure.
- Drivers of performance-oriented hatchbacks often find the tire's touring-focused design disappointing compared to UHP alternatives.
- The tire is frequently noted for transforming the ride quality of vehicles previously fitted with harsh run-flat tires.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Community feedback for the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, highlighting exceptional durability, great wet performance, and high comfort levels. Some users note drawbacks such as softer sidewalls affecting sharp handling during spirited driving, while others debate comparisons with rival brands like Michelin and Continental.
“Advice on new tyres So my car got stolen (RIP) and I bought a 16' MB c200d with rears 245/40r18 Its time to change them and I don't know what to do. A/S are not needed because snow is very rare in central Spain. Winter temperatures range between 0-10°C and summer range from 30 to 40. As I drive 25-30000 km per year I especially value wet performance and durability (Minimum 35-40000 km). The problem is, the tyres that would fit perfectlly to me are not available in this size (GY efficient grip performance 2 -best tyres i've ever had- and Michelin Primacy 5). What i've seen is Firestone (both roadhawk 2 and roadhawk sport), continental PC7, GY assy 6, Michelin PS5, bridgestone T6, Dunlop sport TG, kormoran/tigar/Taurus summer 2, nexen sport, hancook (Ventus evo 137 and Ventus prime 4) and kumho ps72. Even though It would be nice to save some money, i'm worried about losing rear grip when wet (its my first rwd) so its not important. What would you pick? Read more”
“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
“close call, if you looking for rolling resistance Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is the right one but otherwise is PC6. You can see how the newer PC7 fair against the Goodyear below”
“17" Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 small leak Hi, On my VW Touran 2019, 1.5 TSI, 17" alu oem wheels I have set Goodyear efficient grip performance 2 . There is a small leak lets say the pressure goes fro m 2.5psi to 2 psi in approx 7-10 days. The VW tpms warns me usually every 2-3 weeks. Those are summer tires, I just removed them for swapping with winter ones and I haven't cleaned them yet. They are quite dirty at the moment. The leaking one, pictured, was in the front this year, I switch them front/back every year. In my opinion it can do one last year (next summer) in the back. How would you fix the leak? I read those slime sprays damages the tire internally over time, but them its really approaching end of life fast in my opinion... I did visual inspection, I really dont see anything except maybe 1or two very tiny mark that could have been a nail puncture or something but its nothing sure... Maybe soap+ water? Thanks for hints. Ps: I have the tool somewhere for the indicator measurement, I cant find it right now.”
Based on 9 community posts
Michelin Primacy 4
Community opinion on the Michelin Primacy 4 is largely positive, praising its exceptional wet braking capabilities, impressive longevity, low cabin noise, and smooth ride quality. While some users note limitations in heavy snow or rougher tarmac surfaces, it is widely recommended as a top-tier touring tire for daily driving compared to sportier alternatives like the Pilot Sport series.
“Review: Michelin Primacy 4 ST I own a 2023 N8 DCT and recently changed all four tyres from the stock CEATs after one of the tyres’ sidewall was punctured on hitting a rather deep pothole at high speed. Cost: INR 9,750 per tyre Existing tyre buyback: INR 1,000 per tyre (~15k kms) Review: I’ve been using the new tyres for a few weeks now and I’m happy with the upgrade. The difference is noticeable, but only if you pay attention. I’d say a non-savvy person won’t notice anything different unless you ask them to pay attention. At low speeds, the road noise is reduced and the vehicle is noticeably silent (almost dead silent if the roads are smooth and the engine is at low revs) and smoother. At high speeds, the noise level difference is not very noticeable due to the engine and wind noise, but the smoothness and grip is noticeably better. That said, I wouldn’t say the stock tyres are bad (in terms of both - noise and grip) as a lot of reviewers like to point out; definitely not a night and day difference for me. Lastly, I believe the fuel efficiency has improved due to the lower rolling resistance, but I don’t have enough data to claim this confidently. My verdict is to only upgrade if your current tyres are worn out. Personally, I don’t think spending close to 40k is worth it for the budget conscious. But if you have the money to spare, you will definitely be happy with the upgrade. Read more”
“Am avut primacy 4 pe o electrica. Destul de dezamagit de faptul ca dupa ~ 28.000 km s-au tocit rau de au ajuns cam la 3 mm. Placute la condus, silentioase, dar nu cele mai aderente. Pilot sport 4 pe aceiasi electrica cu primacy 4. Huruie de te doare capul. Aderenta nu o simt neaparat wow fata de primacy 4. Nu le mai suport si abia astept sa le trec pe iarna, oricum asta fiind ultima incaltare cu ele. Pe o termica am primacy 5, si sunt cele mai ok din experienta mea. Cele mai silentioase si aderente din cele 3. Dupa 20.000 km uzura a scazut cam cu 1 mm. Recomandarea mea e sa alegi primacy 5 fara ezitare.”
“Both our Polestar2 (new) and 2016 Leaf (Jap import) arrived with Primacy 4s on them. The FWD Polestar needed fronts replaced at ~35k km and being 245/45 R19s Primacy were too pricey so went with Kumho Ecsta PS71 equivalents for a lot cheaper and negligible difference in performance. The rears on the Polestar are still going strong at 45k km and look like at least 60k km will be likely. We also fitted Kumhos on our previous Leaf and were very satisfied with performance and life.”
“When I bought my freshly imported 2014 Nissan Leaf in Sept 2020 it had 27,xxx km on the odometer and a full set of Michelin Primacy 4 that were sidewall dated from very late 2018, so likely only very low mileage on them. I put another 47,000km on them before replacing with a full set of Toyo Proxes C100 Plus in April 2024 which have also been great. The Michelin fronts were certainly very worn particularly the shoulders. I really rate Toyos so would encourage you to have a look. I’ve since put 21,000km on the Toyos and even after 12,500km, in May 2025 at their most recent WOF, the fronts still measured at 7mm and rears 8mm. P.S I paid $900 total for the 4 x Toyos inc. fitting, disposal etc.”
Based on 31 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 | B · Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear
Michelin
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Michelin Primacy 4 if noise matters most to you.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 91 vs 82 on treadwear.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 84 vs 77 on handling.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scores 83 vs 77 on comfort.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 75 vs 70 on noise.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.