82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Dynapro AT M vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
92/100
186 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better snow, wet and comfort. Pick the Hankook Dynapro AT M if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 89 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 78 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 43 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 88 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 9
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 86 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT M | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 90 |
| Dry | 87 | 96 |
| Wet | 78 | 92 |
| Snow | 72 | 87 |
| Comfort | 84 | 94 |
| Noise | 82 | 91 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 93 |
| Handling | 86 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is widely regarded as a high-value, durable all-terrain tire that excels in longevity and on-road comfort. While most users praise its quiet highway performance and reliable traction across varied conditions, a subset of owners reports inconsistent wet-weather grip and concerns regarding sidewall durability.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
- Reliable dry-road handling and off-road capability in mud and gravel
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
- Stiff ride quality, particularly in higher load-range ratings
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (2500HD models) reported significant trailer sway and instability when towing, suggesting the tire sidewalls may be too flexible for heavy-duty towing applications.
- Users with larger, oversized tire configurations (e.g., 35-inch) noted that the tires maintain surprisingly low noise levels even at high highway speeds.
- Owners of light-to-mid-sized SUVs and pickups consistently report the best balance of comfort and performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT M | B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Hankook
90
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better snow, wet and comfort. Pick the Hankook Dynapro AT M if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 87 vs 72 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 92 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Dynapro AT M scores 86 vs 75 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 94 vs 84 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT M
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Dynapro AT M also compared with
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.