Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
92/100
186 owner reviews
Dry
96
Wet
92
Snow
87
Comfort
94
Noise
91
Treadwear
93
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
78/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
56 owner reviews
Dry
88
Wet
82
Snow
69
Comfort
95
Noise
47
Treadwear
83
Handling
76

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better noise, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 8
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
96
B — Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
88
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar A/T G015
Professional tests (TWG score) 88
Tire Rack owners 88
Tyre Reviews owners 89 84

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 10
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
92
B — Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
82
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar A/T G015
Professional tests (TWG score) 79
Tire Rack owners 82
Tyre Reviews owners 78 80

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 18
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
87
B — Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
69
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar A/T G015
Professional tests (TWG score) 59
Tire Rack owners 90
Tyre Reviews owners 43 76

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar A/T G015 leads by 1
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
94
B — Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
95
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar A/T G015
Professional tests (TWG score) 100
Tire Rack owners 83
Tyre Reviews owners 88 86

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 44
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
91
B — Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
47
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar A/T G015
Professional tests (TWG score) 28

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads by 10
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
93
B — Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
83
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar A/T G015
Tire Rack owners 87
Tyre Reviews owners 86 79

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Geolandar A/T G015 leads by 1
A — Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
75
B — Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
76
Why this score
SourceDynaPro A/TM RF10Geolandar A/T G015
Tyre Reviews owners 75 76
DriverReviews owners 86

Scores at a glance

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Relative Score 90 78
Dry 96 88
Wet 92 82
Snow 87 69
Comfort 94 95
Noise 91 47
Treadwear 93 83
Handling 75 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

The Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 is widely regarded as a high-value, durable all-terrain tire that excels in longevity and on-road comfort. While most users praise its quiet highway performance and reliable traction across varied conditions, a subset of owners reports inconsistent wet-weather grip and concerns regarding sidewall durability.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
  • Reliable dry-road handling and off-road capability in mud and gravel

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
  • Stiff ride quality, particularly in higher load-range ratings

Observations

  • Heavy-duty truck owners (2500HD models) reported significant trailer sway and instability when towing, suggesting the tire sidewalls may be too flexible for heavy-duty towing applications.
  • Users with larger, oversized tire configurations (e.g., 35-inch) noted that the tires maintain surprisingly low noise levels even at high highway speeds.
  • Owners of light-to-mid-sized SUVs and pickups consistently report the best balance of comfort and performance.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015

The Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is widely regarded as a highly capable, road-oriented all-terrain tire that excels in balancing daily driving comfort with moderate off-road utility. While most users praise its longevity, wet-weather performance, and snow traction, a segment of owners reports inconsistent tread life and occasional traction issues in specific conditions like deep mud or ice.

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and relatively low noise levels for an all-terrain tire
  • Strong performance in light-to-moderate off-road conditions, including gravel and dirt
  • Impressive tread longevity for many users, with several reports exceeding 40,000 miles
  • Reliable wet-weather handling and 3PMSF (Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake) winter certification
  • Aesthetic appeal with an aggressive tread pattern

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, particularly on heavier trucks
  • Performance limitations in deep mud and heavy, rutted terrain
  • Occasional reports of 'floaty' steering or lack of stability on certain vehicle platforms
  • Mixed feedback regarding wet-weather traction, with some users noting slippage under acceleration

Observations

  • Users of heavy-duty trucks (3/4 ton and 1-ton) report varying experiences, with some praising the load-carrying stability while others note faster tread wear under heavy towing.
  • Subaru owners and light SUV drivers frequently highlight the tire's ability to maintain a quiet, car-like ride compared to more aggressive mud-terrain alternatives.
  • Drivers switching from passenger-rated tires to LT (Light Truck) load-range E versions noted a significant increase in ride harshness and steering stiffness.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015

Positive

Community members generally praise the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 as a comfortable, quiet, and capable all-terrain tire that excels for daily highway commuting while handling light off-road and winter conditions well. It is frequently recommended for drivers prioritizing on-road manners, fuel efficiency, and mild trail or snow capability over heavy rock crawling.

r/battlewagon ·9 upvotes ·2024-10-30

“Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Snow performance. I'm currently running Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015's on my 2013 Subaru XV (WIP) and I live in a semi snowy area and also work in the mountains on construction sites in Japan. My co-workers keep telling me I need dedicated studless (Winter) tires but I had zero Issue with my current tires last year. I got a little stressed out and paranoid about it today when they mentioned it again, yet they have all had slippage on snow with their dedicated tires yet I had zero. Am I over thinking things? My co-workers are asses to be honest, but anyway I've attached some photos of the sort of conditions I drove in with zero trouble, yet they had slippage coming up the hill into the jobsite.”

r/XVcrosstrek ·3 upvotes ·2019-02-13

“GEOLANDAR A/T G015 Anyone running these on 17" rims, stock or other? I have Enkei M52 rims, 17x7.5 and 45mm offset. What size fits without rubbing? 215/60R17 looks to be the closest, the only other size close is 225/65R17 which I think will be too big without a lift. I am open to other suggestions for off-road capable tires that will mainly be used on-road. K02 is out because they don't fit without rubbing, and I plan to add flaps at some point and do not want to lift the vehicle or get different rims.”

r/RangerRaptor ·3 upvotes ·2024-10-19

“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”

r/4Runner ·2026-09-04

“Anyone here running Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 G018's? Any complaints or regrets (road noise, balancing issues, etc.), specifically in SL load? Currently have the Geolandar A/T G015's on my 4th gen and am considering the A/T4's next. All the real feedback (non-commercial reviews) I've been able find on here and other forums seem to be pretty old and mostly by people without a ton of miles on them. My use case is about 90% on road with the remaining 10% on mild to moderate trails. Not a rock crawler and never will be. The G015's in SL load have been pretty perfect but I've been thinking about changing to the A/T4's next for slightly better off road performance. Main concern (aside from weight, which is why I'm looking to stay with SL instead of C) is wet pavement safety since I drive my young kids pretty much daily. I only have a roof rack, so not too much added weight.”

Top themes
#Highway Comfort and Noise#Winter and Snow Performance#Light Off-Road Capability#Fitment and Sizing#Daily Commuting Efficiency

Based on 15 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
CategoryAll Season All Terrain and Off Road tires
Sizes available441
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth13/32″11 - 18/32″
UTQG560 A B360 - 600 A B
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure44 psi35 - 80 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Yokohama

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better noise, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 91 vs 47 on noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 87 vs 69 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 92 vs 82 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 93 vs 83 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.