Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs Kumho Road Venture MT51 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Dynapro AT2

All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire

Hankook Dynapro AT2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
62/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
74
Snow
58
Comfort
71
Noise
–
Treadwear
60
Handling
66

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Kumho Road Venture MT51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
71 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
89
Snow
82
Comfort
91
Noise
92
Treadwear
91
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture MT51 — better treadwear, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 15
A — Hankook Dynapro AT2
80
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
95
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners 83 87
Tyre Reviews owners 80 75
SimpleTire owners – 94

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 15
A — Hankook Dynapro AT2
74
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
89
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners 79 93
Tyre Reviews owners 74 63
SimpleTire owners – 87

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 24
A — Hankook Dynapro AT2
58
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
82
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners 89 88
Tyre Reviews owners 58 63
SimpleTire owners – 83

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 20
A — Hankook Dynapro AT2
71
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
91
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners 71 84
Tyre Reviews owners 71 65
SimpleTire owners – 91

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Dynapro AT2
–
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
92
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT2Road Venture MT51
SimpleTire owners – 83

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 31
A — Hankook Dynapro AT2
60
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
91
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT2Road Venture MT51
Tire Rack owners 86 75
Tyre Reviews owners 60 73
SimpleTire owners – 83

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture MT51 leads by 24
A — Hankook Dynapro AT2
66
B — Kumho Road Venture MT51
90
Why this score
SourceDynapro AT2Road Venture MT51
Tyre Reviews owners 66 58
DriverReviews owners 80 –

Scores at a glance

Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs Kumho Road Venture MT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro AT2Kumho Road Venture MT51
Relative Score 68 90
Dry 80 95
Wet 74 89
Snow 58 82
Comfort 71 91
Noise – 92
Treadwear 60 91
Handling 66 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Dynapro AT2

The Hankook Dynapro A/T2 is generally perceived as a capable highway-oriented all-terrain tire that excels in comfort, fuel efficiency, and dry-road handling. However, user consensus is divided regarding its true off-road durability and winter performance, with some owners reporting significant road noise and premature tread wear depending on the specific tire specification.

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and low noise levels for many users
  • Strong fuel economy and efficiency
  • Reliable traction on dry pavement and gravel surfaces
  • Good towing stability for light-duty applications

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking and casing punctures
  • Increased road noise (drumming) as the tread wears
  • Limited off-road grip compared to dedicated all-terrain competitors

Observations

  • Users noted significant differences between 'Standard' Dynapro retail versions and 'Ford OE' specific versions, with the latter often featuring shallower tread depths and shorter lifespans.
  • Drivers of full-size trucks like the F-150 report mixed experiences, with some praising the towing stability while others find the tire inadequate for winter highway driving.
Tire B Kumho Road Venture MT51

The Kumho Road Venture M/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value mud-terrain tire that punches above its weight class, particularly regarding road noise and comfort. While most users praise its off-road capability and surprisingly quiet highway manners, some report sensitivity to tire pressure and occasional traction limitations in wet or icy conditions.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price point compared to premium competitors
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Strong off-road traction in mud, gravel, and rocky terrain
  • Comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Good tread life and durability when properly maintained

Cons

  • Potential for reduced wet-weather traction if tire pressure is not optimized
  • Some reports of vibration or balancing issues on heavy-duty trucks
  • Susceptibility to cupping if not rotated regularly
  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy compared to highway-terrain tires

Observations

  • Users on lighter vehicles like Jeeps and smaller SUVs frequently report higher satisfaction with ride comfort compared to heavy-duty truck owners.
  • Heavy-duty truck owners (e.g., RAM 2500) occasionally report ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, which may be linked to load ratings or pressure sensitivity.
  • Regular tire rotation is explicitly noted as a critical factor for maintaining the tire's quiet performance over its lifespan.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Mixed

Community opinion on the Hankook Dynapro AT2 (and AT2 Xtreme) is divided between OEM versions and aftermarket/Xtreme variants. Many users praise the aftermarket Xtreme version for its low highway noise, long tread life warranty, and comfortable ride quality, while others find stock OEM versions lacking in wet weather traction and heavy off-road performance.

r/nissanfrontier ·32 upvotes ·2025-09-30

“The stock Dynapro AT2 tires are awful in the rain We've had our first real rain since spring today here in the PNW, and I've gotta say these stock Hankook tires are the worst tires I've ever driven in the rain. Every single time I turned around a corner, it's a one tire fire on the inside rear. I've driven in the rain here my whole life, in cars with far more power than these Frontiers, and I've never once had the TC light kick on unintentionally when it's raining out. I'm not even flooring it, I baby the hell out of this truck! I looked it up online and looks like I'm not the only one who's noticed this. I can't imagine the performance in the snow is any good if it can hardly handle some rain. As much as I hate to waste a set of new tires, I just can not wait to upgrade to something better. Noodling around the neighborhood at 20mph spinning up the rears is not something I'd like to keep doing. Read more”

r/nissanfrontier ·3 upvotes ·2024-10-29

“The OEM Hankook AT2 tires on an F150 are really just an overweight LT tire going through a midlife crisis. There are LT tires that likely perform better in all categories combined while being half a dozen or more pounds lighter. They are the epitome of mediocrity, the AT should stand for A ll T ypes of pavement. Soft ride, decent mileage for AT badging don't make up for sloppy wet braking, mid tier handling an allergy to mud traction and lame tread life. I'm down to 6/32 after 50,000km (31,000 miles) of less than spirited driving, they start at 14/32. The tread wear alone makes these tires damn near twice as costly as KO2s to run. They were passable in winter, better than the KO2s which turn into skates when the thermometer drops Solid 5.5/10”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2024-12-30

“I replaced my BFGoodrich MT T/A tires on my Wrangler with Hankook AT2 Extreme's, and what a difference. I will say I was consistently getting 50k+ miles out of my MT T/A, doing a 5 tire rotation. I'm 8,000 miles in on the AT2's, and there is zero sign of wear. I do have a bit of wobble in my steering wheel now due to the tires needing a balance and rotation, but other than that, I have been very impressed. My wife's mind was blown that our jeep was so much quieter, and we could have a conversation at highway speed without having to yell over the tire noise. These things are practically silent. The off-road performance is greatly improved. Where the MT's would lose traction on mountain trails, the AT2's keep their grip and keep me moving.”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2026-05-26

“I've loved mine on a 2024 Subaru Outback Wilderness. I came from Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S which I loved but that found one too many nails. No issues after 30,000 miles on the Hankooks. I had some Dynapro MT's back on a FJ Cruiser which I loved so that's why I decided to try them again. Just in case someone with an Outback or someone looking at these sizes, here's some data I had compiled. 235/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme RF12 - Overall Diameter 29.1”, Section Width 9.6”, Tread Width 7.5” , Weight 32 lbs 245/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extreme RF12 - Overall Diameter 29.6”, Section Width 10”, Tread Width 7.9” , Weight 35 lbs”

Top themes
#Highway Ride Quality#Wet Weather Traction#Tread Life Warranty#Low Road Noise#OEM vs Aftermarket Differences#Winter and Snow Performance

Based on 36 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Road Venture MT51

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 B · Kumho Road Venture MT51
CategoryAll Terrain and Off Road All Season tire—
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Tread depth—18/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—80 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Road Venture MT51 — better treadwear, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 91 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 82 vs 58 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 90 vs 66 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Road Venture MT51 scores 91 vs 71 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture MT51

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.