81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
89/100
28 professional tests
User signal (40%)
79/100
77 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better noise, handling and comfort. Pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S2 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 59 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 90 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 91% | 88% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 96% | 100% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 91 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 91% | 96% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 90% | 99% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Kinergy 4S2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 90 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 97% | 93% |
| Snow Circle (% of best) | 95% | 91% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 97% | 95% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 95% | 90% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 88 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy 4S2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 | Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 84 |
| Dry | 84 | 72 |
| Wet | 85 | 83 |
| Snow | 78 | 76 |
| Comfort | 80 | 88 |
| Noise | 83 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 87 |
| Handling | 74 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 91% #3/9 · 2026 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 225/40 R18 | 83% #11/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +7.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #3/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 88% #21/35 · 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview | +3.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 96% #2/10 · The BEST All Season Tyres For 2026/27 | 100% #4/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -3.2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% #5/10 · 2023 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | 81% #14/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +13.4 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 61% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | 75% #8/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -13.7 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 99% #5/10 · The BEST All Season Tyres For 2026/27 | 100% #15/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -1.4 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 57% #6/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 50% #3/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +7.2 | Same test |
| Wear | Other | 60% #13/14 · 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 80% #6/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -20.3 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 33% #3/15 · 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 10% #10/30 · 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test | +23.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 97% #4/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test | 93% #5/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +4 | Different tests |
| Snow Circle | Snow | 95% #6/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 91% #10/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +4.1 | Same test |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% #8/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 95% #11/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +2.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 95% #5/9 · 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test | 90% #9/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +5.6 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #3/10 · 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | 94% #8/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +4.6 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #8/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 0% #10/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #4/10 · 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | 96% #4/30 · 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test | -5.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #4/9 · 2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tyre Test | 100% #1/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -2.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 90% #4/10 · The BEST All Season Tyres For 2026/27 | 99% #2/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -8.5 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile all-season tire that excels in wet and cold conditions. While most users praise its exceptional price-to-performance ratio and reliable handling in varied weather, some report concerns regarding road noise at highway speeds and inconsistent tread longevity.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Strong value proposition with a competitive price point
- Reliable performance in cold temperatures and light-to-moderate snow
- Solid dry handling and steering responsiveness for an all-season tire
Cons
- Audible road noise or 'whining' at highway speeds (120-140 km/h)
- Reports of inconsistent tread wear or premature degradation
- Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer or specialized touring tires
- Occasional reports of sudden grip loss at the limit on specific vehicle setups
Observations
- EV owners noted that the tire can be noticeably noisier than specialized low-noise EV tires.
- Users with performance-oriented or heavier vehicles reported more rapid wear on the front axle.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles often praised the tire's ability to improve ride comfort and handling over OEM options.
The Laufenn G Fit 4S is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly all-weather tire that benefits from its association with Hankook manufacturing standards. Users consistently report impressive grip in both wet and snowy conditions, alongside a quiet and responsive driving experience that exceeds expectations for its price point.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong wet weather performance and cornering grip
- Impressive traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- High durability and slow tread wear
Cons
- Increased road noise noted at higher speeds (above 100 km/h)
- Limited long-term data on tread life beyond initial break-in periods
Observations
- Users report high satisfaction when fitted to compact hatchbacks like the Vauxhall Corsa and Skoda Fabia.
- Performance remains consistent across various road surfaces, including steep rural inclines.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy 4S2 | B · Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Hankook
84
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better noise, handling and comfort. Pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 100 vs 83 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 84 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 84 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 88 vs 80 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 also compared with
Laufenn G Fit 4S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.