71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
75/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
65/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better noise, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | 59 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 90 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 88% | 90% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 91% | 100% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 91 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 91% | 91% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 90 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 88 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 84 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 86 |
| Dry | 78 | 72 |
| Wet | 77 | 83 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 64 | 88 |
| Noise | 72 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 87 |
| Handling | 65 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
86
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 88% #11/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 90% #14/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -2.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 91% #6/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 100% #4/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -8.5 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 78% #3/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 81% #14/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -3.2 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #2/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test | 100% #15/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -1.6 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 10% #10/30 · 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test | +10 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #10/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 94% #8/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | +1.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #7/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 91% #18/32 · 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview | +0.6 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #5/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test | 99% #2/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | -1.2 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, value-oriented tire that offers competent dry-weather performance and respectable longevity for daily commuting. While many users appreciate its affordability and fuel efficiency, the consensus is polarized regarding its noise levels and wet-weather confidence, with several reports of premature road noise and inconsistent grip in adverse conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good dry-weather traction and handling
- High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability for many users
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Stiff ride quality and lack of comfort
- Potential for premature dry rot or accelerated wear in specific conditions
Observations
- Users transitioning from larger wheels (17-inch) to smaller diameters (15-inch) reported a significant reduction in road noise.
- Drivers of light city vehicles reported better-than-average tread longevity compared to heavier or more powerful vehicle applications.
The Laufenn G Fit 4S is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly all-weather tire that benefits from its association with Hankook manufacturing standards. Users consistently report impressive grip in both wet and snowy conditions, alongside a quiet and responsive driving experience that exceeds expectations for its price point.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong wet weather performance and cornering grip
- Impressive traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- High durability and slow tread wear
Cons
- Increased road noise noted at higher speeds (above 100 km/h)
- Limited long-term data on tread life beyond initial break-in periods
Observations
- Users report high satisfaction when fitted to compact hatchbacks like the Vauxhall Corsa and Skoda Fabia.
- Performance remains consistent across various road surfaces, including steep rural inclines.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | B · Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Hankook
86
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better noise, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 100 vs 72 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 88 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 87 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 84 vs 65 on handling.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 also compared with
Laufenn G Fit 4S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.