71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Firestone TZ300 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
75/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
65/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Firestone TZ300 and Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 are within 2 points overall. Firestone TZ300 is stronger on comfort and dry. Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is stronger on wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
TZ300 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | TZ300 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | TZ300 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 65 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
TZ300 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | TZ300 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 64 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | TZ300 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 72 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | TZ300 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 68 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | TZ300 | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 65 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone TZ300 | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 81 | 78 |
| Wet | 71 | 77 |
| Comfort | 76 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 68 |
| Handling | 63 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone TZ300 is widely regarded as a competent mid-range tire that offers a strong balance of value and performance for daily driving. While many users praise its wet and dry grip, quiet ride, and longevity, there is a notable divide in user experience regarding tread wear and high-speed stability.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong traction in both wet and dry conditions for standard road use
- Noticeable performance improvement over budget-tier tires
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear life reported across different vehicles
- Reports of increased road noise on certain road surfaces
- Unpredictable handling or light steering feel at higher speeds
- Occasional reports of poor wet-weather braking performance
Observations
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines reported faster-than-expected front tire wear.
- Users noted that the tire provides a significant upgrade in stability and grip when transitioning from budget-brand tires, particularly for towing or daily commuting.
The Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, value-oriented tire that offers competent dry-weather performance and respectable longevity for daily commuting. While many users appreciate its affordability and fuel efficiency, the consensus is polarized regarding its noise levels and wet-weather confidence, with several reports of premature road noise and inconsistent grip in adverse conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good dry-weather traction and handling
- High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability for many users
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Stiff ride quality and lack of comfort
- Potential for premature dry rot or accelerated wear in specific conditions
Observations
- Users transitioning from larger wheels (17-inch) to smaller diameters (15-inch) reported a significant reduction in road noise.
- Drivers of light city vehicles reported better-than-average tread longevity compared to heavier or more powerful vehicle applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone TZ300 | B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Firestone
71
/ 100
Hankook
Too close to call: Firestone TZ300 and Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 are within 2 points overall. Firestone TZ300 is stronger on comfort and dry. Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is stronger on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone TZ300 scores 76 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 77 vs 71 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone TZ300 scores 81 vs 78 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone TZ300
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone TZ300 also compared with
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.