82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Hankook Optimo H426 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 51 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 76 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 25 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 20 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 56 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 58 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 47 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 63 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Hankook Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 67 |
| Dry | 94 | 80 |
| Wet | 74 | 74 |
| Snow | – | 21 |
| Comfort | 86 | 58 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 59 |
| Handling | 91 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
67
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiSport Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling, cornering stability, and predictable feedback. While users consistently praise its track-capable grip and agility, there is a clear divide regarding longevity, with some riders experiencing rapid tread wear depending on bike weight and riding style.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
- Strong performance on track and spirited canyon riding
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Observations
- Lighter motorcycles like the Suzuki SV650 report significantly better mileage (up to 12,500km front) compared to high-output sportbikes like the ZX10R.
- Users noted that the tire's performance profile is better suited for canyon carving and track use than for high-mileage commuting.
The Hankook Optimo H426 presents a polarizing experience, often serving as an OEM tire that provides competent dry and wet traction for daily commuting. While some users appreciate its initial comfort and handling capabilities, the consensus is heavily impacted by concerns regarding premature tread wear and inconsistent noise levels over the life of the tire.
Pros
- Reliable grip and handling on dry pavement
- Confident performance in wet weather conditions
- Initial comfort and quietness when new
Cons
- Short tread life and premature wear
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- High price point relative to performance value
- Uneven wear patterns across front and rear axles
Observations
- Users reported significantly faster wear on front-wheel-drive vehicles, leading to uneven tread depletion compared to rear tires.
- Drivers of compact sedans noted that while the tire offers decent handling, it fails to maintain its initial noise-dampening qualities over time.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Hankook Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Continental
67
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 86 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 91 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 74 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 94 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · Continental ContiSport Attack
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H426
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiSport Attack also compared with
Hankook Optimo H426 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.