Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Optimo H428 vs Nexen CP661 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Hankook Optimo H428 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
19/100
Owner ratings
Dry
62
Wet
47
Snow
19
Comfort
61
Noise
62
Treadwear
60
Handling
62

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen CP661

Summer Touring tires

Nexen CP661 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
10 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
71
Snow
–
Comfort
76
Noise
–
Treadwear
80
Handling
72

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen CP661 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CP661 leads by 15
A — Hankook Optimo H428
62
B — Nexen CP661
77
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428CP661
Tire Rack owners 63 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 77

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CP661 leads by 24
A — Hankook Optimo H428
47
B — Nexen CP661
71
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428CP661
Tire Rack owners 49 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 71

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Optimo H428
19
B — Nexen CP661
–
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428CP661
Tire Rack owners 19 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CP661 leads by 15
A — Hankook Optimo H428
61
B — Nexen CP661
76
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428CP661
Tire Rack owners 62 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 76

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Optimo H428
62
B — Nexen CP661
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CP661 leads by 20
A — Hankook Optimo H428
60
B — Nexen CP661
80
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428CP661
Tire Rack owners 61 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CP661 leads by 10
A — Hankook Optimo H428
62
B — Nexen CP661
72
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428CP661
Tyre Reviews owners – 72

Scores at a glance

Hankook Optimo H428 vs Nexen CP661: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Optimo H428Nexen CP661
Relative Score 57 75
Dry 62 77
Wet 47 71
Snow 19 –
Comfort 61 76
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 60 80
Handling 62 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Optimo H428

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Nexen CP661

The Nexen CP661 is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that consistently exceeds expectations for daily driving and family-oriented vehicles. Users report reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, alongside commendable tread longevity and low noise levels, making it a strong competitor against more expensive premium brands.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium alternatives.
  • Reliable and consistent grip in both wet and dry weather conditions.
  • Impressive tread life, with some users reporting significantly higher mileage than premium tires.
  • Low road noise levels contributing to a comfortable ride quality.

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear reports, with some users experiencing premature replacement intervals.
  • Performance is optimized for standard commuting rather than high-performance driving.
  • Limited availability of specific speed ratings or sizes for specialized vehicles.

Observations

  • Users driving front-wheel-drive hatchbacks noted excellent straight-line tracking and stability on motorway surfaces.
  • Owners of family-oriented vehicles ('mum buses') frequently praised the tire for providing a safe and confident driving experience in varied road conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Optimo H428 B · Nexen CP661
Category—Summer Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9.5/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Nexen

Winner: Nexen CP661 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen CP661 scores 71 vs 47 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen CP661 scores 80 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen CP661 scores 77 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen CP661 scores 76 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Optimo H428
Tire B · Nexen CP661

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.