Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Hankook Optimo H725 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

High Performance All Season tire

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
67
Snow
20
Comfort
50
Noise
–
Treadwear
75
Handling
57

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Hankook Optimo H725 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
31/100
Owner ratings
Dry
68
Wet
56
Snow
46
Comfort
58
Noise
55
Treadwear
48
Handling
68

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Hankook Optimo H725 if snow, handling and comfort matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advantage T/A leads by 12
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
80
B — Hankook Optimo H725
68
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/AOptimo H725
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advantage T/A leads by 11
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
67
B — Hankook Optimo H725
56
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/AOptimo H725
Tyre Reviews owners 67 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Optimo H725 leads by 26
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
20
B — Hankook Optimo H725
46
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/AOptimo H725
Tyre Reviews owners 20 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Optimo H725 leads by 8
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
50
B — Hankook Optimo H725
58
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/AOptimo H725
Tyre Reviews owners 50 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
–
B — Hankook Optimo H725
55

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advantage T/A leads by 27
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
75
B — Hankook Optimo H725
48
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/AOptimo H725
Tyre Reviews owners 75 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Optimo H725 leads by 11
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
57
B — Hankook Optimo H725
68
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/AOptimo H725
Tyre Reviews owners 57 –

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Hankook Optimo H725: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/AHankook Optimo H725
Relative Score 61 56
Dry 80 68
Wet 67 56
Snow 20 46
Comfort 50 58
Noise – 55
Treadwear 75 48
Handling 57 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich Advantage T/A

The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.

Pros

  • Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
  • Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions

Cons

  • Highly unpredictable compound performance
  • Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions

Observations

  • The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
Tire B Hankook Optimo H725

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A B · Hankook Optimo H725
CategoryHigh Performance All Season tire—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG560 - 680 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Hankook

Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A — better treadwear, dry and wet. Pick the Hankook Optimo H725 if snow, handling and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 75 vs 48 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Optimo H725 scores 46 vs 20 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 80 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 67 vs 56 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H725

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.