Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook OPTIMO K715 vs Kumho Solus KH17 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook OPTIMO K715

Summer Touring tires

Hankook OPTIMO K715 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
68
Comfort
82
Treadwear
58
Handling
58

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Solus KH17

Summer Touring tires

Kumho Solus KH17 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
56 owner reviews
Dry
76
Wet
70
Comfort
70
Treadwear
67
Handling
69

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Solus KH17 — better handling and treadwear. Pick the Hankook OPTIMO K715 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) OPTIMO K715 leads by 1
A — Hankook OPTIMO K715
77
B — Kumho Solus KH17
76
Why this score
SourceOPTIMO K715Solus KH17
Tyre Reviews owners 77 76

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus KH17 leads by 2
A — Hankook OPTIMO K715
68
B — Kumho Solus KH17
70
Why this score
SourceOPTIMO K715Solus KH17
Tyre Reviews owners 68 70

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) OPTIMO K715 leads by 12
A — Hankook OPTIMO K715
82
B — Kumho Solus KH17
70
Why this score
SourceOPTIMO K715Solus KH17
Tyre Reviews owners 82 70

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus KH17 leads by 9
A — Hankook OPTIMO K715
58
B — Kumho Solus KH17
67
Why this score
SourceOPTIMO K715Solus KH17
Tyre Reviews owners 58 67

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus KH17 leads by 11
A — Hankook OPTIMO K715
58
B — Kumho Solus KH17
69
Why this score
SourceOPTIMO K715Solus KH17
Tyre Reviews owners 58 69

Scores at a glance

Hankook OPTIMO K715 vs Kumho Solus KH17: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook OPTIMO K715Kumho Solus KH17
Relative Score 67 70
Dry 77 76
Wet 68 70
Comfort 82 70
Treadwear 58 67
Handling 58 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook OPTIMO K715

The Hankook Optimo K715 is generally regarded as a competent OEM-level tire that provides reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions. While some users appreciate its longevity and balanced performance on smaller vehicles, others report inconsistent tread wear and concerns regarding long-term sidewall durability.

Pros

  • Reliable grip in both wet and dry road conditions
  • Satisfactory tread life for light-duty compact vehicles
  • Unexpectedly capable performance in light snow conditions
  • Good value proposition as an OEM-fitted tire

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking or structural degradation
  • Underwhelming performance characteristics for some compact car owners

Observations

  • Users operating compact vehicles like the Hyundai i10 and Ford Fiesta report mixed experiences regarding the balance between grip and longevity.
  • Long-term storage or low-usage scenarios on vehicles like the Hyundai Getz may lead to premature sidewall cracking.
Tire B Kumho Solus KH17

The Kumho Solus KH17 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, high-value tire that performs reliably for daily commuting and highway driving. While many users praise its dry grip and cost-effectiveness, consensus is polarized by inconsistent tread wear and reports of premature degradation, particularly when fitted as original equipment on specific compact vehicles.

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong dry weather traction and road feedback
  • Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Predictable handling characteristics for normal driving

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature wear
  • Mixed performance in wet conditions
  • Susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and structural issues
  • Increased road noise as the tread wears down

Observations

  • Owners of Hyundai i10 and i20 models frequently report significantly lower-than-average tread life and rapid wear compared to users of other vehicle makes.
  • Drivers of larger or heavier vehicles often report better satisfaction with longevity and stability than those using the tire on smaller city cars.
  • Some users noted that the tire's noise profile changes significantly, becoming more audible at city speeds (40-80 km/h) while remaining quiet at highway velocities.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook OPTIMO K715 B · Kumho Solus KH17
CategorySummer Touring tiresSummer Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Solus KH17 — better handling and treadwear. Pick the Hankook OPTIMO K715 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook OPTIMO K715 scores 82 vs 70 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus KH17 scores 69 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Solus KH17 scores 67 vs 58 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook OPTIMO K715
Tire B · Kumho Solus KH17

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.