78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
81/100
12 professional tests
User signal (40%)
81/100
123 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better noise, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 91 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 60 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 65 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU4 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 86 |
| Dry | 88 | 91 |
| Wet | 83 | 87 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 68 | 88 |
| Noise | 65 | 91 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 82 |
| Handling | 79 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
86
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 is widely regarded as a high-value touring tire that excels in dry conditions and offers a comfortable, quiet ride for daily commuting. While it is frequently praised for its competitive pricing and balanced performance, some users report inconsistent wet-weather confidence and accelerated tread wear when subjected to heavier vehicle loads or aggressive driving styles.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and braking performance
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Comfortable ride quality with effective vibration absorption
- Predictable and stable handling for touring applications
Cons
- Increased risk of hydroplaning as tread depth decreases
- Accelerated tread wear on heavier vehicles or under high-torque conditions
- Noise levels can increase noticeably after several thousand miles
- Sidewall durability concerns, including reports of cracking
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles (e.g., MPVs like the Sharan or SUVs) report significantly faster tread wear and reduced longevity.
- Drivers noted that the tire performs best as a comfort-oriented touring tire, with some users finding it less responsive or 'dull' on smaller 16-inch rim sizes compared to 17-inch variants.
- Performance is highly sensitive to tread depth; wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance drop off noticeably once the tire reaches the 3-4mm wear mark.
The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
- Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
- Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
- Not suitable for high-performance track applications
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
- Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
- Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Hankook
86
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better noise, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 65 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 83 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 88 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.