78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
16 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Falken Azenis RT 615 vs Hankook Ventus R-S4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Hankook
Hankook Ventus R-S4
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Falken Azenis RT 615 and Hankook Ventus R-S4 are within 2 points overall. Falken Azenis RT 615 is stronger on comfort and dry. Hankook Ventus R-S4 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Azenis RT 615 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Azenis RT 615 | Ventus R-S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Azenis RT 615 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Azenis RT 615 | Ventus R-S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 72 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Azenis RT 615 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Azenis RT 615 | Ventus R-S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 61 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ventus R-S4 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Azenis RT 615 | Ventus R-S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 86 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ventus R-S4 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Azenis RT 615 | Ventus R-S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 88 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Azenis RT 615 | Hankook Ventus R-S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 79 |
| Dry | 93 | 87 |
| Wet | 73 | 72 |
| Snow | 67 | – |
| Comfort | 76 | 61 |
| Noise | 77 | – |
| Treadwear | 76 | 86 |
| Handling | 78 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Azenis RT 615 is widely regarded as a high-value, entry-level performance tire that bridges the gap between street and track use. Users consistently praise its dry-weather grip and durability, making it a popular choice for budget-conscious enthusiasts and amateur endurance racers.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering stability
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium track-focused tires
- Impressive tread longevity for a 200TW (treadwear) rated tire
- Predictable handling characteristics suitable for beginners
Cons
- Poor performance and hydroplaning risk in heavy rain
- Requires a break-in period to reach optimal stickiness
- Lacks the refinement and wet-weather capability of top-tier max-performance summer tires
- Can be noisy or harsh depending on vehicle application
Observations
- Versatile performance across diverse platforms, ranging from lightweight chassis like the Mazda RX7 and BMW E30 to heavier vehicles like the C4 Corvette.
- Users noted that the tire responds well to specific pressure adjustments, with some reporting better results when running slightly higher PSI.
The Hankook Ventus RS4 is widely regarded as the industry benchmark for endurance-focused extreme performance summer tires. While it may not offer the absolute peak grip of specialized autocross tires, it is highly praised for its exceptional tread life, heat consistency, and value, making it a favorite for HPDE participants and endurance racers.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability under heavy track abuse
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to more expensive competitors
- Consistent dry grip and performance throughout the tire's lifespan
- Predictable handling and excellent steering feedback
- Strong heat resistance during long track sessions
Cons
- Requires significant time and effort to reach optimal operating temperatures
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality compared to standard tires
- Reduced traction in cold or wet conditions
- Potential fitment issues due to narrow section width relative to nominal size
Observations
- Lightweight FWD vehicles report excellent handling characteristics and high confidence with this tire.
- Users note that the tire's sidewall width runs narrow, which may leave rims exposed if sized based on standard tire width expectations.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Azenis RT 615 | B · Hankook Ventus R-S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Falken
79
/ 100
Hankook
Too close to call: Falken Azenis RT 615 and Hankook Ventus R-S4 are within 2 points overall. Falken Azenis RT 615 is stronger on comfort and dry. Hankook Ventus R-S4 is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken Azenis RT 615 scores 76 vs 61 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 86 vs 76 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 88 vs 78 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken Azenis RT 615 scores 93 vs 87 on dry.
Tire A · Falken Azenis RT 615
Tire B · Hankook Ventus R-S4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken Azenis RT 615 also compared with
Hankook Ventus R-S4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.