Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Ventus R-S4 vs Kumho IZen KW27 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Hankook Ventus R-S4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
20 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
72
Snow
–
Comfort
61
Treadwear
86
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho IZen KW27

Winter High Performance tires

Kumho IZen KW27 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
32 owner reviews
Dry
76
Wet
75
Snow
75
Comfort
83
Treadwear
78
Handling
69

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus R-S4 — better handling, dry and treadwear. Pick the Kumho IZen KW27 if comfort and wet matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus R-S4 leads by 11
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
87
B — Kumho IZen KW27
76
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4IZen KW27
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 87 76

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) IZen KW27 leads by 3
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
72
B — Kumho IZen KW27
75
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4IZen KW27
Tire Rack owners 71 –
Tyre Reviews owners 72 75

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
–
B — Kumho IZen KW27
75
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4IZen KW27
Tyre Reviews owners – 75

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) IZen KW27 leads by 22
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
61
B — Kumho IZen KW27
83
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4IZen KW27
Tire Rack owners 75 –
Tyre Reviews owners 61 83

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus R-S4 leads by 8
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
86
B — Kumho IZen KW27
78
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4IZen KW27
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 78

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus R-S4 leads by 19
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
88
B — Kumho IZen KW27
69
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4IZen KW27
Tyre Reviews owners 88 69

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus R-S4 vs Kumho IZen KW27: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus R-S4Kumho IZen KW27
Relative Score 79 76
Dry 87 76
Wet 72 75
Snow – 75
Comfort 61 83
Treadwear 86 78
Handling 88 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus R-S4

The Hankook Ventus RS4 is widely regarded as the industry benchmark for endurance-focused extreme performance summer tires. While it may not offer the absolute peak grip of specialized autocross tires, it is highly praised for its exceptional tread life, heat consistency, and value, making it a favorite for HPDE participants and endurance racers.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability under heavy track abuse
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to more expensive competitors
  • Consistent dry grip and performance throughout the tire's lifespan
  • Predictable handling and excellent steering feedback
  • Strong heat resistance during long track sessions

Cons

  • Requires significant time and effort to reach optimal operating temperatures
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality compared to standard tires
  • Reduced traction in cold or wet conditions
  • Potential fitment issues due to narrow section width relative to nominal size

Observations

  • Lightweight FWD vehicles report excellent handling characteristics and high confidence with this tire.
  • Users note that the tire's sidewall width runs narrow, which may leave rims exposed if sized based on standard tire width expectations.
Tire B Kumho IZen KW27

The Kumho IZen KW27 is a polarizing winter tire that excels in deep snow and ice, often surprising users with its durability and traction in severe conditions. However, it receives significant criticism for its performance in wet, slushy, or warmer winter conditions, where many drivers report a 'floaty' handling feel, reduced steering feedback, and a tendency for the vehicle to lose traction.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and braking performance on snow and ice
  • High tread longevity and durability over long mileages
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium European brands

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather grip and high risk of hydroplaning
  • Vague steering feedback and 'floaty' handling characteristics
  • Performance drops significantly when temperatures rise above 8-10°C
  • Requires a lengthy break-in period (300+ miles) to achieve optimal performance

Observations

  • Users with high-horsepower or performance-oriented vehicles (300+ bhp) frequently report issues with wet-weather traction and stability.
  • Drivers of 4x4 and AWD vehicles (e.g., Honda CRV, Audi Quattro) generally report higher satisfaction with snow performance compared to FWD/RWD users.
  • Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on being fitted as a full set of four, with mixed-tire setups leading to unpredictable handling.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus R-S4 B · Kumho IZen KW27
Category—Winter High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Kumho

Winner: Hankook Ventus R-S4 — better handling, dry and treadwear. Pick the Kumho IZen KW27 if comfort and wet matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho IZen KW27 scores 83 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 88 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 87 vs 76 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 86 vs 78 on treadwear.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus R-S4
Tire B · Kumho IZen KW27

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.