53
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Ventus K104 vs Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
13 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ventus RS2 Z212 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | Ventus RS2 Z212 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 91 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ventus RS2 Z212 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | Ventus RS2 Z212 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 42 | 61 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ventus RS2 Z212 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | Ventus RS2 Z212 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 69 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ventus RS2 Z212 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | Ventus RS2 Z212 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 74 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ventus RS2 Z212 leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | Ventus RS2 Z212 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 44 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus K104 | Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 73 |
| Dry | 68 | 91 |
| Wet | 42 | 61 |
| Comfort | 61 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 74 |
| Handling | 44 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
Tire A
73
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus K104 is generally regarded as a budget-oriented performance tire that offers acceptable dry-weather handling for enthusiasts with specific suspension setups, but it suffers from significant deficiencies in wet-weather traction. While some users appreciate its responsiveness and longevity, the consensus points toward inconsistent performance, high road noise, and a lack of confidence-inspiring grip in damp or rainy conditions.
Pros
- Responsive and crisp handling characteristics in dry conditions
- Competitive price point for budget-conscious buyers
- Good tread life for users who maintain proper suspension geometry
- Aesthetically pleasing tread pattern
Cons
- Poor and unpredictable wet-weather traction
- High levels of road noise
- Inconsistent tread wear performance across different vehicle types
- Lack of progressive grip during cornering
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on precise suspension tuning, with some suggesting it is better suited for performance-oriented setups than standard passenger vehicles.
- Drivers of luxury vehicles, such as Mercedes-Benz, reported that the tire's high noise levels negatively impacted the overall refinement of the vehicle.
- Light commercial vehicle users reported premature tread wear, suggesting the tire is not well-suited for heavier loads or utility applications.
The Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented summer tire that excels in dry, spirited driving and light track use. While users consistently praise its dry grip, stiff sidewall feedback, and affordability, it is frequently noted for its poor wet-weather performance and increased road noise.
Pros
- Exceptional dry pavement grip and cornering stability
- High value-for-money ratio compared to dedicated track tires
- Stiff sidewalls providing excellent steering feedback
- Progressive handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Significant lack of traction and hydroplaning risk in wet conditions
- High levels of road noise and reduced ride comfort
- Rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive driving
- Sensitivity to overheating during prolonged track sessions
Observations
- Drivers of heavier vehicles (approx. 1350kg) noted the tire offers a better balance of longevity and grip compared to softer, track-focused alternatives.
- Users reported that the tire requires a warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperatures, particularly in cooler climates.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus K104 | B · Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Hankook
73
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 scores 80 vs 44 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 scores 91 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 scores 61 vs 42 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 scores 74 vs 55 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus K104
Tire B · Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus K104 also compared with
Hankook Ventus RS2 Z212 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.