53
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Ventus K104 vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better wet, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 59 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 41
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 42 | 91 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 90 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 88 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 32
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
G Fit 4S leads by 40
Why this score
| Source | Ventus K104 | G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 44 | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus K104 | Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 83 |
| Dry | 68 | 72 |
| Wet | 42 | 83 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 61 | 88 |
| Noise | – | 100 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 87 |
| Handling | 44 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus K104 is generally regarded as a budget-oriented performance tire that offers acceptable dry-weather handling for enthusiasts with specific suspension setups, but it suffers from significant deficiencies in wet-weather traction. While some users appreciate its responsiveness and longevity, the consensus points toward inconsistent performance, high road noise, and a lack of confidence-inspiring grip in damp or rainy conditions.
Pros
- Responsive and crisp handling characteristics in dry conditions
- Competitive price point for budget-conscious buyers
- Good tread life for users who maintain proper suspension geometry
- Aesthetically pleasing tread pattern
Cons
- Poor and unpredictable wet-weather traction
- High levels of road noise
- Inconsistent tread wear performance across different vehicle types
- Lack of progressive grip during cornering
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on precise suspension tuning, with some suggesting it is better suited for performance-oriented setups than standard passenger vehicles.
- Drivers of luxury vehicles, such as Mercedes-Benz, reported that the tire's high noise levels negatively impacted the overall refinement of the vehicle.
- Light commercial vehicle users reported premature tread wear, suggesting the tire is not well-suited for heavier loads or utility applications.
The Laufenn G Fit 4S is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly all-weather tire that benefits from its association with Hankook manufacturing standards. Users consistently report impressive grip in both wet and snowy conditions, alongside a quiet and responsive driving experience that exceeds expectations for its price point.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong wet weather performance and cornering grip
- Impressive traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- High durability and slow tread wear
Cons
- Increased road noise noted at higher speeds (above 100 km/h)
- Limited long-term data on tread life beyond initial break-in periods
Observations
- Users report high satisfaction when fitted to compact hatchbacks like the Vauxhall Corsa and Skoda Fabia.
- Performance remains consistent across various road surfaces, including steep rural inclines.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus K104 | B · Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Hankook
83
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better wet, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 83 vs 42 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 84 vs 44 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 87 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 88 vs 61 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus K104
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus K104 also compared with
Laufenn G Fit 4S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.