Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 62 · 20 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV is ahead, 66–54
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 559 reviews
“2024 EXL Tire Review - Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/60/18 Replaced the oem tires with only 10,000 miles with these after reading reviews and the price point. Very happy with them, better handling and feel with less road noise and much better on grooved pavement. The oem Bridgestones wandered badly on grooved pavement. Highly recommended. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +1060Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 SUV CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) 73 – Reviews found online 66 55 -
73
Wet
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +1360Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 SUV CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) 76 – Reviews found online 68 57 -
–
Snow
No comparison61Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 SUV CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online – 55 -
65
Comfort
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +164Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 SUV CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 61 58 -
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 SUV CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online – 61 -
58
Treadwear
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +1543Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 SUV CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 53 27 -
64
Handling
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +1747Why this score
Source Ventus S1 evo2 SUV CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 64 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 54 |
| Dry | 70 | 60 |
| Wet | 73 | 60 |
| Snow | – | 61 |
| Comfort | 65 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 43 |
| Handling | 64 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
54
/ 100
CrossContact LX Sport
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry grip with strong confidence-inspiring handling
- High value for money compared to premium Tier-1 brand alternatives
- Good ride comfort and low road noise for highway cruising
Cons
- Premature outer block and edge wear, particularly on front axles
- Poor performance in snow and ice, typical of summer tires
- Limited off-road capability
Tire B CrossContact LX Sport
Pros
- Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
- Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
- Confident performance in light snow and winter weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
- Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
- Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Community opinions on the Continental CrossContact LX Sport are mixed, with some owners praising their handling, quiet ride, and role as OEM equipment, while others report disappointment, premature wear, and sidewall durability issues. They are frequently compared to newer alternatives like the Hankook iON evo AS SUV and Michelin CrossClimate2, particularly in EV efficiency discussions.
r/VWatlas
·3 upvotes ·2019-10-07
“Issues with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires Anybody having premature wear on their tires? In South Texas these tires are notorious for having flaking/peeling/chunking issues on the tread. Had to replace mine after 26k, but noticed the issues much earlier than that. Not a warrantable condition but Continental did give proration based on tread depth. Used the credit towards some new Michelins. Read more”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-07-05
“Yokohama YK-CTX rolling resistance I blew a tire on my fairly new to me Audi Q8 E-tron EV while out of town, and the only reasonable tires in stock were Yokohama YK-CTX. I was previously running Continental CrossContact LX Sport (which are poorly rated on TireRack but seem to be the OE tire), and I'd prefer to not lose any significant range. I'm concerned that Discount Tire's website shows the YK-CTX with even lower EV range than the CrossClimate2 which most say loses 10% range compared to OE EV tires. Does anybody have any experience or knowledge of the YK-CTX compared to an EV specific tire? Discount Tire's website has no information on the CrossContact LX Sport for comparison, and I'm not sure how accurate this EV range data is.”
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2025-10-26
“CrossContact LX Sport Hey folks, I have a 2024 CRV with 4 CrossContact LX Sport tires from the dealership. I have less than 9500 miles om my vehicle/tires but it appears I have a slight hole on the sidewall. If I place my finger on it the air stops coming out. I ordered a set of CrossClimate2s from Costco knowing that AWD vehicles need to match all 4 generally speaking to prevent issues with the drive train, but after my father member looked at it he insisted that I just need to slap a replacement on the single tire given theyre so new. Tldr: is it worth to buy a new set of CrossClimate2s or should I just get a single CrossContact and have tire rack match the tread depth? Kinda don't wanna be out $1400 but also went with my gut on it given i dont wanna f up my drive train on my vehicle and the CrossContacts according to reviews have high failure rates even at low mileage. Please let me know.”
Top themes
#OEM Equipment Quality#EV Efficiency and Range#Wear and Durability Issues#Road Noise and Handling#Tire Comparisons
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 32 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 480 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
54
/ 100
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 64 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 58 vs 43 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 73 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 70 vs 60 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.