Tests 75 · 16 tests Owners 79 · 22 reviews
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Nexen Winguard Sport 2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Winter i cept evo3 is ahead, 79–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Winter i cept evo3 +671Why this score
Source Winter i cept evo3 Winguard Sport 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) 76 – Reviews found online 79 72 -
89
Wet
Winter i cept evo3 +1574Why this score
Source Winter i cept evo3 Winguard Sport 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) 92 – Reviews found online 84 75 -
79
Snow
Winter i cept evo3 +673Why this score
Source Winter i cept evo3 Winguard Sport 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) 79 – Reviews found online 79 75 -
70
Comfort
Winguard Sport 2 SUV +272Why this score
Source Winter i cept evo3 Winguard Sport 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 70 75 -
31
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Winter i cept evo3 Winguard Sport 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) 10 – -
76
Treadwear
Winter i cept evo3 +1066Why this score
Source Winter i cept evo3 Winguard Sport 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) 76 – Reviews found online 76 65 -
78
Handling
Winter i cept evo3 +672Why this score
Source Winter i cept evo3 Winguard Sport 2 SUV Reviews found online 78 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Winter i cept evo3 | Nexen Winguard Sport 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 71 |
| Dry | 77 | 71 |
| Wet | 89 | 74 |
| Snow | 79 | 73 |
| Comfort | 70 | 72 |
| Noise | 31 | – |
| Treadwear | 76 | 66 |
| Handling | 78 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Winter i cept evo3
Winguard Sport 2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winter i cept evo3
Pros
- Exceptional wet grip and outstanding aquaplaning resistance
- Outstanding snow and ice traction providing high confidence in winter storms
- Great value for money compared to Tier-1 brands like Michelin or Goodyear
Cons
- Slightly increased noise levels or humming compared to summer tires
- Mixed feedback on ride comfort, with some finding them stiffer
- Longer braking distances reported by a few users in specific conditions
Tire B Winguard Sport 2 SUV
Pros
- Excellent grip and control on snow, ice, and slush
- High comfort levels with low road noise
- Strong price-to-performance ratio and durability
Cons
- Softer sidewalls result in less precise handling during cornering and high-speed maneuvers
- Performance on snow and ice can degrade over successive years
- Feel less planted and more flexible in warmer temperatures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter i cept evo3 | B · Nexen Winguard Sport 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Nexen Winguard Sport 2 SUV
Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 89 vs 74 on wet.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 76 vs 66 on treadwear.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 77 vs 71 on dry.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 79 vs 73 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.